PAWZ vs. INKM
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares Pet Care ETF (PAWZ) and SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF (INKM).
PAWZ and INKM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PAWZ is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the FactSet Pet Care Index. It was launched on Nov 5, 2018. INKM is an actively managed fund by State Street. It was launched on Apr 25, 2012.
Performance
PAWZ vs. INKM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PAWZ vs. INKM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAWZ ProShares Pet Care ETF | -5.79% | 1.21% | 3.88% | 12.47% | -40.08% | 10.46% | 61.69% | 22.95% | -9.71% |
INKM SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF | 2.48% | 11.86% | 5.70% | 10.26% | -12.58% | 8.52% | 3.11% | 17.12% | -2.10% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PAWZ achieves a -5.79% return, which is significantly lower than INKM's 2.48% return.
PAWZ
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- -8.97%
- YTD
- -5.79%
- 6M
- -7.65%
- 1Y
- -0.97%
- 3Y*
- 1.85%
- 5Y*
- -6.12%
- 10Y*
- —
INKM
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- -3.01%
- YTD
- 2.48%
- 6M
- 3.39%
- 1Y
- 10.75%
- 3Y*
- 8.82%
- 5Y*
- 4.13%
- 10Y*
- 5.48%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PAWZ vs. INKM - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both PAWZ and INKM have an expense ratio of 0.50%.
Return for Risk
PAWZ vs. INKM — Risk / Return Rank
PAWZ
INKM
PAWZ vs. INKM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Pet Care ETF (PAWZ) and SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF (INKM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PAWZ | INKM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.05 | 1.38 | -1.43 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.06 | 1.95 | -1.90 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.29 | -0.28 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.05 | 1.92 | -1.97 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.12 | 8.53 | -8.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PAWZ | INKM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.05 | 1.38 | -1.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.31 | 0.50 | -0.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.56 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.18 | 0.55 | -0.38 |
Correlation
The correlation between PAWZ and INKM is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
PAWZ vs. INKM - Dividend Comparison
PAWZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, less than INKM's 5.01% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAWZ ProShares Pet Care ETF | 0.81% | 0.81% | 0.63% | 0.44% | 0.54% | 0.18% | 0.14% | 0.35% | 0.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
INKM SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF | 5.01% | 5.82% | 4.83% | 4.56% | 5.03% | 3.74% | 3.88% | 4.38% | 4.08% | 3.10% | 3.39% | 3.45% |
Drawdowns
PAWZ vs. INKM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PAWZ drawdown since its inception was -50.07%, which is greater than INKM's maximum drawdown of -28.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAWZ and INKM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PAWZ | INKM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.07% | -28.58% | -21.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.80% | -5.76% | -10.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.07% | -19.18% | -30.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.58% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.32% | -3.21% | -34.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.18% | -3.73% | -18.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.57% | 1.30% | +5.27% |
Volatility
PAWZ vs. INKM - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Pet Care ETF (PAWZ) has a higher volatility of 5.31% compared to SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF (INKM) at 2.97%. This indicates that PAWZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INKM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PAWZ | INKM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.31% | 2.97% | +2.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.37% | 4.62% | +5.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.36% | 7.83% | +10.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.07% | 8.30% | +11.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.72% | 9.77% | +11.95% |