PAVE vs. RSHO

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

PAVE (Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF) and RSHO (Tema American Reshoring ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PAVE is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the INDXX U.S. Infrastructure Development Index, while RSHO is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Tema. PAVE is passively managed, while RSHO is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, PAVE returned 25.73%/yr vs 30.96%/yr for RSHO. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PAVE charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for RSHO.

Performance

PAVE vs. RSHO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) and Tema American Reshoring ETF (RSHO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAVE achieves a 22.22% return, which is significantly lower than RSHO's 39.40% return.

PAVE

• 1D: 1.04%
• 1M: 6.32%
• YTD: 22.22%
• 6M: 19.45%
• 1Y: 36.66%
• 3Y*: 25.73%
• 5Y*: 18.54%
• 10Y*: —

RSHO

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 9.15%
• YTD: 39.40%
• 6M: 36.26%
• 1Y: 59.78%
• 3Y*: 30.96%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAVE vs. RSHO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF	22.22%	19.36%	17.92%	24.93%
RSHO Tema American Reshoring ETF	39.40%	19.23%	17.28%	28.90%

Correlation

The correlation between PAVE and RSHO is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2023	0.95

The correlation between PAVE and RSHO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

PAVE vs. RSHO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PAVE	RSHO
Industrials	75.9%	74.2%
Basic Materials	19.5%	8.1%
Utilities	3.1%	-
Technology	1.0%	11.8%
Consumer Defensive	0.2%	-
Energy	0.2%	0.9%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	3.7%
Financial Services	-	0.8%
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

PAVE vs. RSHO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAVE

PAVE Risk / Return Rank: 64
PAVE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
PAVE Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
PAVE Omega Ratio Rank: 57
PAVE Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
PAVE Martin Ratio Rank: 68

RSHO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAVE vs. RSHO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) and Tema American Reshoring ETF (RSHO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PAVE	RSHO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.88	2.62	-0.74
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.64	3.41	-0.77
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.43	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.09	4.45	-1.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.23	16.97	-5.74

PAVE vs. RSHO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAVE Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is comparable to the RSHO Sharpe Ratio of 2.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAVE and RSHO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PAVE vs. RSHO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAVE drawdown since its inception was -44.08%, which is greater than RSHO's maximum drawdown of -27.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAVE and RSHO.

Drawdown Indicators

	PAVE	RSHO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.08%	-27.31%	-16.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.91%	-14.64%	+2.73%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.23%	-27.31%	+1.08%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.23%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.40%	0.00%	-1.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.21%	-4.27%	-1.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.27%	3.83%	-0.56%

Volatility

PAVE vs. RSHO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) is 7.04%, while Tema American Reshoring ETF (RSHO) has a volatility of 9.26%. This indicates that PAVE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RSHO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PAVE	RSHO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.04%	9.26%	-2.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.92%	20.99%	-5.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.60%	24.93%	-5.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.66%	22.82%	-1.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.39%	22.82%	+1.57%

PAVE vs. RSHO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAVE has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than RSHO's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

PAVE vs. RSHO - Dividend Comparison

PAVE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, while RSHO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF	0.75%	0.92%	0.54%	0.68%	0.84%	0.48%	0.44%	0.67%	0.78%	0.30%
RSHO Tema American Reshoring ETF	0.21%	0.30%	0.26%	0.25%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PAVE and RSHO in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, PAVE and RSHO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, PAVE or RSHO?

RSHO has higher volatility (9.26%) compared to PAVE (7.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAVE dropped -44.08% vs RSHO's -27.31%.

Which ETF is better, PAVE or RSHO?

On 3-year performance, RSHO leads with 30.96% vs 25.73% for PAVE. On fees, PAVE is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, PAVE has been the lower-risk option at 7.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PAVE or RSHO?

Over the 3-year period, RSHO has performed better with a 30.96% return vs 25.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PAVE or RSHO?

PAVE is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for RSHO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PAVE or RSHO?

PAVE has the higher dividend yield at 0.75%, compared with 0.21% for RSHO.

What is the main difference between PAVE and RSHO?

PAVE is categorized as Industrials Equities, while RSHO is Mid Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Tema. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for PAVE and 0.75% for RSHO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RSHO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.