RSHO vs. RFV
Compare and contrast key facts about Tema American Reshoring ETF (RSHO) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF (RFV).
RSHO and RFV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RSHO is an actively managed fund by Tema. It was launched on May 10, 2023. RFV is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P Mid Cap 400 Pure Value. It was launched on Mar 1, 2006.
Performance
RSHO vs. RFV - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RSHO vs. RFV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
RSHO Tema American Reshoring ETF | 12.27% | 19.23% | 17.28% | 28.26% |
RFV Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF | 2.24% | 7.66% | 5.63% | 27.27% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSHO achieves a 12.27% return, which is significantly higher than RFV's 2.24% return.
RSHO
- 1D
- 4.94%
- 1M
- -8.70%
- YTD
- 12.27%
- 6M
- 16.13%
- 1Y
- 47.15%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RFV
- 1D
- 1.99%
- 1M
- -3.38%
- YTD
- 2.24%
- 6M
- 2.35%
- 1Y
- 16.32%
- 3Y*
- 13.21%
- 5Y*
- 9.38%
- 10Y*
- 11.65%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RSHO vs. RFV - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSHO has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than RFV's 0.35% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RSHO vs. RFV — Risk / Return Rank
RSHO
RFV
RSHO vs. RFV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tema American Reshoring ETF (RSHO) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF (RFV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RSHO | RFV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.83 | 0.67 | +1.16 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.55 | 1.14 | +1.41 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.15 | +0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.18 | 1.06 | +2.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.76 | 3.47 | +8.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RSHO | RFV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.83 | 0.67 | +1.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.42 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.47 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.26 | 0.36 | +0.90 |
Correlation
The correlation between RSHO and RFV is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RSHO vs. RFV - Dividend Comparison
RSHO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, less than RFV's 2.04% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSHO Tema American Reshoring ETF | 0.26% | 0.30% | 0.26% | 0.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RFV Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF | 2.04% | 2.07% | 1.31% | 1.27% | 2.05% | 1.60% | 1.52% | 1.71% | 1.39% | 1.36% | 0.88% | 1.79% |
Drawdowns
RSHO vs. RFV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSHO drawdown since its inception was -27.31%, smaller than the maximum RFV drawdown of -71.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSHO and RFV.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSHO | RFV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.31% | -71.82% | +44.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.64% | -15.62% | +0.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.65% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -52.24% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.42% | -8.48% | -1.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.43% | -9.85% | +5.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.95% | 4.78% | -0.83% |
Volatility
RSHO vs. RFV - Volatility Comparison
Tema American Reshoring ETF (RSHO) has a higher volatility of 11.13% compared to Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF (RFV) at 5.23%. This indicates that RSHO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RFV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RSHO | RFV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.13% | 5.23% | +5.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.64% | 13.17% | +4.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.94% | 24.40% | +1.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.91% | 22.22% | -0.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.91% | 25.05% | -3.14% |