RSHO vs. RFV

In the year-to-date period, RSHO achieves a 1.64% return, which is significantly higher than RFV's -1.70% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

RSHO has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than RFV's 0.35% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tema American Reshoring ETF (RSHO) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF (RFV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current RSHO Sharpe Ratio is 0.28, which is higher than the RFV Sharpe Ratio of 0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSHO and RFV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

RSHO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, less than RFV's 1.60% yield.

The maximum RSHO drawdown since its inception was -27.31%, smaller than the maximum RFV drawdown of -71.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSHO and RFV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Tema American Reshoring ETF (RSHO) has a higher volatility of 6.87% compared to Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF (RFV) at 6.07%. This indicates that RSHO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RFV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.