PAVE vs. ITA
PAVE (Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF) and ITA (iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PAVE is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the INDXX U.S. Infrastructure Development Index, while ITA is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select Aerospace & Defense Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PAVE returned 17.84%/yr vs 16.86%/yr for ITA. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PAVE charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for ITA.
Performance
PAVE vs. ITA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PAVE achieves a 20.86% return, which is significantly higher than ITA's 8.97% return.
PAVE
- 1D
- 1.01%
- 1M
- 4.24%
- YTD
- 20.86%
- 6M
- 18.50%
- 1Y
- 38.94%
- 3Y*
- 25.14%
- 5Y*
- 17.84%
- 10Y*
- —
ITA
- 1D
- -0.95%
- 1M
- 7.60%
- YTD
- 8.97%
- 6M
- 11.71%
- 1Y
- 30.42%
- 3Y*
- 27.30%
- 5Y*
- 16.86%
- 10Y*
- 15.34%
PAVE vs. ITA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF | 20.86% | 19.36% | 17.92% | 31.01% | -7.17% | 36.42% | 19.72% | 33.26% | -19.15% | 13.41% |
ITA iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF | 8.97% | 48.64% | 15.81% | 14.33% | 9.96% | 9.39% | -13.57% | 30.51% | -7.22% | 25.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between PAVE and ITA is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2017 | 0.72 |
The correlation between PAVE and ITA shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.72 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PAVE vs. ITA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PAVE
ITA
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Technology
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Industrials
PAVE
ITA
Basic Materials
PAVE
ITA
-
Utilities
PAVE
ITA
-
Technology
PAVE
ITA
Consumer Defensive
PAVE
ITA
-
Energy
PAVE
ITA
-
Communication Services
PAVE
-
ITA
-
Consumer Cyclical
PAVE
-
ITA
-
Financial Services
PAVE
-
ITA
-
Healthcare
PAVE
-
ITA
-
Real Estate
PAVE
-
ITA
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PAVE vs. ITA — Risk / Return Rank
PAVE
ITA
PAVE vs. ITA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) and iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF (ITA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PAVE | ITA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.25 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.11 | 1.97 | +1.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.32 | 5.20 | +6.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PAVE vs. ITA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PAVE drawdown since its inception was -44.08%, smaller than the maximum ITA drawdown of -59.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAVE and ITA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PAVE | ITA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.08% | -59.72% | +15.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.91% | -15.82% | +3.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.23% | -15.82% | -10.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.23% | -18.72% | -7.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -51.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.01% | -6.64% | +5.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.23% | -9.45% | +3.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.27% | 5.97% | -2.70% |
Volatility
PAVE vs. ITA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) is 7.35%, while iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF (ITA) has a volatility of 9.07%. This indicates that PAVE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ITA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PAVE | ITA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.35% | 9.07% | -1.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.87% | 18.47% | -2.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.49% | 21.74% | -2.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.70% | 20.21% | +1.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.40% | 23.22% | +1.18% |
PAVE vs. ITA - Expense Ratio Comparison
PAVE has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than ITA's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
PAVE vs. ITA - Dividend Comparison
PAVE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, more than ITA's 0.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITA iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.85% | 0.93% | 0.95% | 0.82% | 1.07% | 1.54% | 1.13% | 0.91% | 1.07% | 1.04% |
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF | 0.76% | 0.92% | 0.54% | 0.68% | 0.84% | 0.48% | 0.44% | 0.67% | 0.78% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PAVE and ITA have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ITA has higher volatility (9.07%) compared to PAVE (7.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAVE dropped -44.08% vs ITA's -59.72%.
On 5-year performance, PAVE leads with 17.84% vs 16.86% for ITA. On fees, ITA is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, PAVE has been the lower-risk option at 7.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PAVE has performed better with a 17.84% return vs 16.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ITA is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for PAVE.
PAVE has the higher dividend yield at 0.76%, compared with 0.46% for ITA.
PAVE is categorized as Industrials Equities, while ITA is Aerospace & Defense. PAVE tracks INDXX U.S. Infrastructure Development Index, while ITA tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Aerospace & Defense Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for PAVE and 0.38% for ITA.
PAVE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PAVE and ITA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer