PAVE vs. FBMPX

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

PAVE (Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF) and FBMPX (Fidelity Select Communication Services Portfolio) are both funds - PAVE is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the INDXX U.S. Infrastructure Development Index, while FBMPX is a Communications Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, PAVE returned 17.84%/yr vs 13.16%/yr for FBMPX. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PAVE charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for FBMPX.

Performance

PAVE vs. FBMPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) and Fidelity Select Communication Services Portfolio (FBMPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAVE achieves a 20.86% return, which is significantly higher than FBMPX's 6.45% return.

PAVE

• 1D: 1.01%
• 1M: 2.28%
• YTD: 20.86%
• 6M: 18.50%
• 1Y: 36.91%
• 3Y*: 25.14%
• 5Y*: 17.84%
• 10Y*: —

FBMPX

• 1D: 1.26%
• 1M: -4.77%
• YTD: 6.45%
• 6M: 7.98%
• 1Y: 31.47%
• 3Y*: 32.60%
• 5Y*: 13.16%
• 10Y*: 17.13%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAVE vs. FBMPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF	20.86%	19.36%	17.92%	31.01%	-7.17%	36.42%	19.72%	33.26%	-19.15%	13.41%
FBMPX Fidelity Select Communication Services Portfolio	6.45%	37.07%	35.98%	56.85%	-38.30%	15.97%	35.48%	33.14%	-3.52%	3.56%

Correlation

The correlation between PAVE and FBMPX is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.47
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.52
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2017	0.57

The correlation between PAVE and FBMPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.59 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PAVE vs. FBMPX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PAVE	FBMPX
Industrials	74.8%	0.3%
Basic Materials	20.3%	-
Utilities	3.2%	-
Technology	1.1%	13.1%
Consumer Defensive	0.3%	-
Energy	0.2%	-
Communication Services	-	83.1%
Consumer Cyclical	-	2.8%
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	0.7%
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

PAVE vs. FBMPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAVE

PAVE Risk / Return Rank: 67
PAVE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
PAVE Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
PAVE Omega Ratio Rank: 60
PAVE Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
PAVE Martin Ratio Rank: 70

FBMPX

FBMPX Risk / Return Rank: 43
FBMPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
FBMPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
FBMPX Omega Ratio Rank: 45
FBMPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
FBMPX Martin Ratio Rank: 38

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAVE vs. FBMPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) and Fidelity Select Communication Services Portfolio (FBMPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PAVE	FBMPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.90	1.61	+0.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.69	2.26	+0.43
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.29	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.11	1.83	+1.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.32	6.79	+4.53

PAVE vs. FBMPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAVE Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is comparable to the FBMPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAVE and FBMPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PAVE vs. FBMPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAVE drawdown since its inception was -44.08%, smaller than the maximum FBMPX drawdown of -61.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAVE and FBMPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PAVE	FBMPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.08%	-61.77%	+17.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.91%	-16.90%	+4.99%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.23%	-23.20%	-3.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.23%	-47.42%	+21.19%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-47.42%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.01%	-6.18%	+5.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.23%	-10.62%	+4.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.27%	4.56%	-1.29%

Volatility

PAVE vs. FBMPX - Volatility Comparison

Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) has a higher volatility of 7.35% compared to Fidelity Select Communication Services Portfolio (FBMPX) at 5.48%. This indicates that PAVE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBMPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PAVE	FBMPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.35%	5.48%	+1.87%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.87%	14.31%	+1.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.49%	19.24%	+0.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.70%	23.30%	-1.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.40%	21.98%	+2.42%

PAVE vs. FBMPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAVE has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than FBMPX's 0.74% expense ratio.

Dividends

PAVE vs. FBMPX - Dividend Comparison

PAVE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, less than FBMPX's 12.58% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FBMPX Fidelity Select Communication Services Portfolio	12.58%	8.09%	7.05%	0.00%	0.00%	5.88%	3.74%	35.43%	15.29%	5.53%	7.50%	7.29%
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF	0.76%	0.92%	0.54%	0.68%	0.84%	0.48%	0.44%	0.67%	0.78%	0.30%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PAVE and FBMPX in my portfolio?

PAVE and FBMPX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PAVE or FBMPX?

PAVE has higher volatility (7.35%) compared to FBMPX (5.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAVE dropped -44.08% vs FBMPX's -61.77%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PAVE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.