PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FBMPX vs. FSTCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FBMPX vs. FSTCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Select Communication Services Portfolio (FBMPX) and Fidelity Select Telecommunications Portfolio (FSTCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBMPX achieves a 9.44% return, which is significantly lower than FSTCX's 24.05% return. Over the past 10 years, FBMPX has outperformed FSTCX with an annualized return of 17.12%, while FSTCX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.13% annualized return.


FBMPX

1D
-1.18%
1M
1.96%
YTD
9.44%
6M
11.67%
1Y
40.01%
3Y*
34.39%
5Y*
14.32%
10Y*
17.12%

FSTCX

1D
1.27%
1M
6.16%
YTD
24.05%
6M
23.79%
1Y
31.22%
3Y*
24.53%
5Y*
6.30%
10Y*
8.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBMPX vs. FSTCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FBMPX
Fidelity Select Communication Services Portfolio
9.44%37.07%35.98%56.85%-38.30%15.97%35.48%33.14%-3.52%12.60%
FSTCX
Fidelity Select Telecommunications Portfolio
24.05%11.63%21.18%7.29%-16.99%-2.69%20.63%20.43%-8.03%1.44%

Correlation

The correlation between FBMPX and FSTCX is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 1986

0.69

Over the past year, the correlation between FBMPX and FSTCX has dropped to 0.36 - well below their long-term average of 0.69, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FBMPX vs. FSTCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBMPX
FBMPX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
FBMPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBMPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBMPX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
FBMPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBMPX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

FSTCX
FSTCX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
FSTCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSTCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSTCX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
FSTCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSTCX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBMPX vs. FSTCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Communication Services Portfolio (FBMPX) and Fidelity Select Telecommunications Portfolio (FSTCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FBMPXFSTCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.32

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.34

3.89

-1.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.87

11.43

-2.56

FBMPX vs. FSTCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBMPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is comparable to the FSTCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBMPX and FSTCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FBMPXFSTCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.08

1.94

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

0.36

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

0.45

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.47

+0.19

Drawdowns

FBMPX vs. FSTCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBMPX drawdown since its inception was -61.77%, smaller than the maximum FSTCX drawdown of -82.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBMPX and FSTCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FBMPXFSTCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.77%

-82.81%

+21.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.90%

-8.24%

-8.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.20%

-11.00%

-12.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.42%

-33.14%

-14.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.42%

-34.08%

-13.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.54%

-0.97%

-2.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.63%

-24.64%

+14.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.46%

2.80%

+1.66%

Volatility

FBMPX vs. FSTCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Select Communication Services Portfolio (FBMPX) is 4.81%, while Fidelity Select Telecommunications Portfolio (FSTCX) has a volatility of 5.29%. This indicates that FBMPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSTCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FBMPXFSTCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.81%

5.29%

-0.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.91%

13.09%

+0.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.03%

16.50%

+2.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.26%

17.70%

+5.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.97%

17.99%

+3.98%

FBMPX vs. FSTCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBMPX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than FSTCX's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

FBMPX vs. FSTCX - Dividend Comparison

FBMPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.24%, more than FSTCX's 2.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FBMPX
Fidelity Select Communication Services Portfolio
12.24%8.09%7.05%0.00%0.00%5.88%3.74%35.43%15.29%5.53%7.50%7.29%
FSTCX
Fidelity Select Telecommunications Portfolio
2.36%2.57%2.19%3.72%8.13%15.37%8.11%3.33%3.23%19.90%6.40%1.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


FBMPX and FSTCX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSTCX has higher volatility (5.29%) compared to FBMPX (4.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBMPX dropped -61.77% vs FSTCX's -82.81%.

FBMPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FBMPX and FSTCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer