PAUG vs. QTUM

Last updated Jun 16, 2026

PAUG (Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - August) and QTUM (Defiance Quantum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PAUG is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect August Series Index, while QTUM is a Technology Equities fund tracking the BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PAUG returned 9.23%/yr vs 29.16%/yr for QTUM. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PAUG charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for QTUM.

Performance

PAUG vs. QTUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - August (PAUG) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAUG achieves a 5.25% return, which is significantly lower than QTUM's 53.56% return.

PAUG

• 1D: 0.40%
• 1M: 1.02%
• YTD: 5.25%
• 6M: 5.77%
• 1Y: 15.45%
• 3Y*: 13.76%
• 5Y*: 9.23%
• 10Y*: —

QTUM

• 1D: 4.18%
• 1M: 17.45%
• YTD: 53.56%
• 6M: 53.19%
• 1Y: 94.08%
• 3Y*: 50.50%
• 5Y*: 29.16%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAUG vs. QTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
PAUG Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - August	5.25%	12.34%	15.37%	17.71%	-6.85%	7.58%	9.82%	3.60%
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF	53.56%	36.65%	50.54%	39.86%	-28.80%	35.18%	42.05%	15.91%

Correlation

The correlation between PAUG and QTUM is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.74
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.73
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2019	0.77

The correlation between PAUG and QTUM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

PAUG vs. QTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PAUG	QTUM
Technology	38.4%	83.6%
Financial Services	11.0%	0.0%
Communication Services	10.8%	4.8%
Consumer Cyclical	10.0%	0.7%
Healthcare	8.4%	0.6%
Industrials	7.9%	8.7%
Consumer Defensive	4.6%	-
Energy	3.2%	-
Utilities	2.1%	-
Real Estate	1.8%	-
Basic Materials	1.7%	-

Return for Risk

PAUG vs. QTUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAUG

PAUG Risk / Return Rank: 90
PAUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
PAUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
PAUG Omega Ratio Rank: 93
PAUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
PAUG Martin Ratio Rank: 92

QTUM

QTUM Risk / Return Rank: 92
QTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
QTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
QTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 90
QTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
QTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAUG vs. QTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - August (PAUG) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PAUG	QTUM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.80	3.31	-0.51
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.19	3.78	+0.41
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.60	1.51	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.92	6.20	-2.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	21.35	22.43	-1.07

PAUG vs. QTUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAUG Sharpe Ratio is 2.80, which is comparable to the QTUM Sharpe Ratio of 3.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAUG and QTUM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PAUG vs. QTUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAUG drawdown since its inception was -17.88%, smaller than the maximum QTUM drawdown of -38.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAUG and QTUM.

Drawdown Indicators

	PAUG	QTUM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.88%	-38.45%	+20.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.96%	-15.26%	+11.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.45%	-25.39%	+14.94%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-11.76%	-38.45%	+26.69%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.42%	+0.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.81%	-8.24%	+6.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.72%	4.21%	-3.49%

Volatility

PAUG vs. QTUM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - August (PAUG) is 1.01%, while Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) has a volatility of 14.65%. This indicates that PAUG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PAUG	QTUM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.01%	14.65%	-13.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.26%	23.48%	-19.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.55%	28.64%	-23.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.72%	27.06%	-18.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.58%	27.43%	-16.85%

PAUG vs. QTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAUG has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than QTUM's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

PAUG vs. QTUM - Dividend Comparison

PAUG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QTUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
PAUG Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - August	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	1.33%	0.00%
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF	0.70%	1.01%	0.61%	0.81%	1.46%	0.48%	0.42%	0.61%	0.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PAUG and QTUM in my portfolio?

PAUG and QTUM have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PAUG or QTUM?

QTUM has higher volatility (14.65%) compared to PAUG (1.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAUG dropped -17.88% vs QTUM's -38.45%.

Which ETF is better, PAUG or QTUM?

On 5-year performance, QTUM leads with 29.16% vs 9.23% for PAUG. On fees, QTUM is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, PAUG has been the lower-risk option at 1.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PAUG or QTUM?

Over the 5-year period, QTUM has performed better with a 29.16% return vs 9.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PAUG or QTUM?

QTUM is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for PAUG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PAUG or QTUM?

QTUM has the higher dividend yield at 0.70%, compared with 0.00% for PAUG.

What is the main difference between PAUG and QTUM?

PAUG is categorized as Defined Outcome, while QTUM is Technology Equities. PAUG tracks Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect August Series Index, while QTUM tracks BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for PAUG and 0.40% for QTUM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.31 vs 2.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.