PATN vs. PTNQ

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

PATN (Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF) and PTNQ (Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PATN is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq International Patent Leaders Index, while PTNQ is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Pacer NASDAQ-100 Trendpilot Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, PATN returned 65.39% vs 26.55% for PTNQ. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.65% expense ratio.

Performance

PATN vs. PTNQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF (PATN) and Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF (PTNQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PATN achieves a 34.64% return, which is significantly higher than PTNQ's 9.62% return.

PATN

• 1D: -5.19%
• 1M: 4.01%
• YTD: 34.64%
• 6M: 35.70%
• 1Y: 65.39%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PTNQ

• 1D: -3.23%
• 1M: -0.25%
• YTD: 9.62%
• 6M: 8.18%
• 1Y: 26.55%
• 3Y*: 13.52%
• 5Y*: 10.45%
• 10Y*: 16.40%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PATN vs. PTNQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
PATN Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF	34.64%	40.01%	-1.73%
PTNQ Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF	9.62%	7.18%	5.02%

Correlation

The correlation between PATN and PTNQ is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2024	0.66

The correlation between PATN and PTNQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

PATN vs. PTNQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PATN

PATN Risk / Return Rank: 87
PATN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
PATN Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
PATN Omega Ratio Rank: 87
PATN Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
PATN Martin Ratio Rank: 88

PTNQ

PTNQ Risk / Return Rank: 46
PTNQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
PTNQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
PTNQ Omega Ratio Rank: 45
PTNQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
PTNQ Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PATN vs. PTNQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF (PATN) and Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF (PTNQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PATN	PTNQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.75	1.54	+1.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.37	2.05	+1.32
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	1.27	+0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.56	2.27	+2.30
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.76	7.49	+10.27

PATN vs. PTNQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PATN Sharpe Ratio is 2.75, which is higher than the PTNQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PATN and PTNQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PATN vs. PTNQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PATN drawdown since its inception was -16.77%, smaller than the maximum PTNQ drawdown of -28.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PATN and PTNQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	PATN	PTNQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.77%	-28.07%	+11.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.40%	-11.76%	-2.64%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-14.19%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-18.47%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-28.07%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.19%	-4.12%	-1.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.17%	-5.68%	+2.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.69%	3.55%	+0.14%

Volatility

PATN vs. PTNQ - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF (PATN) has a higher volatility of 12.88% compared to Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF (PTNQ) at 8.74%. This indicates that PATN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PTNQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PATN	PTNQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.88%	8.74%	+4.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.37%	13.70%	+7.67%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.92%	17.37%	+6.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.26%	13.39%	+8.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.26%	16.51%	+5.75%

PATN vs. PTNQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PATN and PTNQ have an expense ratio of 0.65%.

Dividends

PATN vs. PTNQ - Dividend Comparison

PATN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, more than PTNQ's 0.80% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PATN Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF	1.61%	2.25%	0.30%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PTNQ Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF	0.80%	0.88%	1.96%	1.47%	0.62%	0.00%	0.16%	0.44%	0.45%	0.32%	0.30%	0.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PATN and PTNQ in my portfolio?

PATN and PTNQ have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PATN or PTNQ?

PATN has higher volatility (12.88%) compared to PTNQ (8.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PATN dropped -16.77% vs PTNQ's -28.07%.

Which ETF is better, PATN or PTNQ?

On 1-year performance, PATN leads with 65.39% vs 26.55% for PTNQ. Both ETFs have the same 0.65% expense ratio. On volatility, PTNQ has been the lower-risk option at 8.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PATN or PTNQ?

Over the 1-year period, PATN has performed better with a 65.39% return vs 26.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PATN or PTNQ?

PATN and PTNQ have the same expense ratio: 0.65% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PATN or PTNQ?

PATN has the higher dividend yield at 1.61%, compared with 0.80% for PTNQ.

What is the main difference between PATN and PTNQ?

PATN is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while PTNQ is Large Cap Blend Equities. PATN tracks Nasdaq International Patent Leaders Index, while PTNQ tracks Pacer NASDAQ-100 Trendpilot Index.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PATN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.