PATN vs. MCSE

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

PATN (Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF) and MCSE (Franklin Sustainable International Equity ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. PATN is passively managed, while MCSE is actively managed. Over the past year, PATN returned 53.28% vs 4.30% for MCSE. Their 0.59 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. PATN charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for MCSE.

Performance

PATN vs. MCSE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF (PATN) and Franklin Sustainable International Equity ETF (MCSE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PATN achieves a 28.74% return, which is significantly higher than MCSE's 1.12% return.

PATN

• 1D: 0.61%
• 1M: -3.34%
• 6M: 17.25%
• YTD: 28.74%
• 1Y: 53.28%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 35.65%

MCSE

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• 6M: 0.00%
• YTD: 1.12%
• 1Y: 4.30%
• 3Y*: 0.74%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 6.06%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
MCSE Franklin Sustainable International Equity ETF	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
PATN Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF	$6.30M	$4.83M	$3.83M

PATN vs. MCSE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
PATN Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF	28.74%	40.01%	-1.73%
MCSE Franklin Sustainable International Equity ETF	1.12%	7.79%	-11.20%

Correlation

The correlation between PATN and MCSE is 0.40, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.40
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2024	0.59

The correlation between PATN and MCSE shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (1 year) to 0.59 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PATN vs. MCSE - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PATN	MCSE
Technology	43.9%	31.1%
Industrials	17.5%	18.1%
Consumer Cyclical	10.5%	13.8%
Healthcare	9.5%	20.1%
Communication Services	7.0%	4.7%
Consumer Defensive	6.2%	5.0%
Basic Materials	3.2%	5.1%
Energy	0.9%	-
Financial Services	0.7%	2.1%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

PATN vs. MCSE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PATN

PATN Risk / Return Rank: 83
PATN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
PATN Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
PATN Omega Ratio Rank: 83
PATN Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
PATN Martin Ratio Rank: 82

MCSE

MCSE Risk / Return Rank: 20
MCSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
MCSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
MCSE Omega Ratio Rank: 24
MCSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
MCSE Martin Ratio Rank: 18

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PATN vs. MCSE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF (PATN) and Franklin Sustainable International Equity ETF (MCSE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PATN	MCSE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.11	0.46	+1.65
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.71	0.70	+2.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.12	+0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.72	0.45	+3.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.66	1.13	+10.53

PATN vs. MCSE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PATN Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is higher than the MCSE Sharpe Ratio of 0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PATN and MCSE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PATN vs. MCSE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PATN drawdown since its inception was -16.77%, smaller than the maximum MCSE drawdown of -26.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PATN and MCSE.

Drawdown Indicators

	PATN	MCSE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.77%	-26.36%	+9.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.40%	-10.42%	-3.98%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-26.36%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.34%	-10.51%	+1.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.44%	-8.80%	+5.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.58%	4.37%	+0.21%

Volatility

PATN vs. MCSE - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF (PATN) has a higher volatility of 8.80% compared to Franklin Sustainable International Equity ETF (MCSE) at 0.00%. This indicates that PATN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MCSE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PATN	MCSE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.80%	0.00%	+8.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.85%	1.87%	+20.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.38%	10.29%	+15.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.70%	19.07%	+3.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.70%	19.07%	+3.63%

PATN vs. MCSE - Expense Ratio Comparison

PATN has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than MCSE's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

PATN vs. MCSE - Dividend Comparison

PATN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%, less than MCSE's 3.74% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
MCSE Franklin Sustainable International Equity ETF	3.74%	3.78%	0.63%	0.57%	0.48%
PATN Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF	1.69%	2.25%	0.30%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PATN and MCSE in my portfolio?

PATN and MCSE have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PATN or MCSE?

PATN has higher volatility (8.80%) compared to MCSE (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PATN dropped -16.77% vs MCSE's -26.36%.

Which ETF is better, PATN or MCSE?

On 1-year performance, PATN leads with 53.28% vs 4.30% for MCSE. On fees, MCSE is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, MCSE has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PATN or MCSE?

Over the 1-year period, PATN has performed better with a 53.28% return vs 4.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PATN or MCSE?

MCSE is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for PATN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PATN or MCSE?

MCSE has the higher dividend yield at 3.74%, compared with 1.69% for PATN.

What is the main difference between PATN and MCSE?

They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Franklin. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for PATN and 0.59% for MCSE.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PATN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.