PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PATK vs. AWI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PATK vs. AWI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Patrick Industries, Inc. (PATK) and Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (AWI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PATK achieves a -15.67% return, which is significantly higher than AWI's -19.50% return. Over the past 10 years, PATK has outperformed AWI with an annualized return of 15.77%, while AWI has yielded a comparatively lower 14.89% annualized return.


PATK

1D
-0.01%
1M
7.04%
YTD
-15.67%
6M
-15.60%
1Y
7.09%
3Y*
25.79%
5Y*
12.69%
10Y*
15.77%

AWI

1D
0.24%
1M
-6.17%
YTD
-19.50%
6M
-18.10%
1Y
-0.44%
3Y*
34.52%
5Y*
8.45%
10Y*
14.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PATK vs. AWI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PATK
Patrick Industries, Inc.
-15.67%32.70%26.49%69.62%-23.07%19.72%32.77%77.91%-57.37%36.53%
AWI
Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
-19.50%36.23%45.05%45.37%-40.26%57.44%-19.97%62.79%-3.61%44.86%

Correlation

The correlation between PATK and AWI is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2006

0.30

The correlation between PATK and AWI shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (all time) to 0.59 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PATK:

$3.27B

AWI:

$6.62B

EPS

PATK:

$3.90

AWI:

$7.04

PE Ratio

PATK:

23.25

AWI:

21.76

PS Ratio

PATK:

0.80

AWI:

4.05

PB Ratio

PATK:

2.75

AWI:

7.41

Total Revenue (TTM)

PATK:

$3.94B

AWI:

$1.65B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PATK:

$911.13M

AWI:

$664.10M

EBITDA (TTM)

PATK:

$378.29M

AWI:

$578.40M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PATK vs. AWI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PATK
PATK Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
PATK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PATK Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
PATK Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
PATK Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
PATK Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

AWI
AWI Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
AWI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AWI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
AWI Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
AWI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
AWI Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PATK vs. AWI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Patrick Industries, Inc. (PATK) and Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (AWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PATKAWIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.02

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.17

-0.02

+0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.44

-0.04

+0.48

PATK vs. AWI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PATK Sharpe Ratio is 0.21, which is higher than the AWI Sharpe Ratio of -0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PATK and AWI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PATKAWIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

-0.02

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

0.32

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

0.50

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

0.30

-0.08

Drawdowns

PATK vs. AWI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PATK drawdown since its inception was -98.61%, which is greater than AWI's maximum drawdown of -80.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PATK and AWI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PATKAWIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.61%

-80.98%

-17.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-41.39%

-24.54%

-16.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-41.39%

-24.54%

-16.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.75%

-46.06%

-3.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.62%

-46.44%

-26.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-37.27%

-24.35%

-12.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.86%

-18.25%

-13.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.27%

10.37%

+5.90%

Volatility

PATK vs. AWI - Volatility Comparison

Patrick Industries, Inc. (PATK) has a higher volatility of 10.67% compared to Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (AWI) at 7.32%. This indicates that PATK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AWI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PATKAWIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.67%

7.32%

+3.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.54%

20.10%

+7.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.81%

25.26%

+9.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.41%

26.15%

+11.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.10%

29.95%

+16.15%

Dividends

PATK vs. AWI - Dividend Comparison

PATK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, more than AWI's 0.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
AWI
Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
0.86%0.66%0.81%1.06%1.38%0.74%1.09%0.77%0.30%
PATK
Patrick Industries, Inc.
2.00%1.54%1.81%1.89%2.38%1.45%1.51%0.48%0.00%

Financials

PATK vs. AWI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Patrick Industries, Inc. and Armstrong World Industries, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B1.40B20222023202420252026
997.17M
409.90M
(PATK) Total Revenue
(AWI) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PATK vs. AWI - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Patrick Industries, Inc. and Armstrong World Industries, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%40.0%20222023202420252026
22.8%
37.9%
Portfolio components
PATK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Patrick Industries, Inc. reported a gross profit of 226.86M and revenue of 997.17M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.8%.

AWI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Armstrong World Industries, Inc. reported a gross profit of 155.30M and revenue of 409.90M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.9%.

PATK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Patrick Industries, Inc. reported an operating income of 64.72M and revenue of 997.17M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.5%.

AWI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Armstrong World Industries, Inc. reported an operating income of 94.20M and revenue of 409.90M, resulting in an operating margin of 23.0%.

PATK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Patrick Industries, Inc. reported a net income of 39.48M and revenue of 997.17M, resulting in a net margin of 4.0%.

AWI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Armstrong World Industries, Inc. reported a net income of 66.80M and revenue of 409.90M, resulting in a net margin of 16.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PATK and AWI have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PATK has higher volatility (10.67%) compared to AWI (7.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PATK dropped -98.61% vs AWI's -80.98%.

PATK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.21 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PATK and AWI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer