PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PATK vs. AVGO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PATK vs. AVGO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Patrick Industries, Inc. (PATK) and Broadcom Inc. (AVGO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PATK achieves a -23.21% return, which is significantly lower than AVGO's 12.89% return. Over the past 10 years, PATK has underperformed AVGO with an annualized return of 12.75%, while AVGO has yielded a comparatively higher 40.86% annualized return.


PATK

1D
-1.73%
1M
-2.92%
6M
-34.01%
YTD
-23.21%
1Y
-14.40%
3Y*
15.06%
5Y*
10.59%
10Y*
12.75%
ALL TIME*
15.17%

AVGO

1D
0.37%
1M
8.00%
6M
17.93%
YTD
12.89%
1Y
35.86%
3Y*
63.70%
5Y*
54.52%
10Y*
40.86%
ALL TIME*
40.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$7.09B$8.00B$10.48B
$47.70M$60.01M$55.68M

PATK vs. AVGO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PATK
Patrick Industries, Inc.
-23.21%32.70%26.49%69.62%-23.07%19.72%32.77%77.91%-57.37%36.53%
AVGO
Broadcom Inc.
12.89%50.63%110.49%104.18%-13.27%56.48%44.88%29.05%2.18%48.19%

Correlation

The correlation between PATK and AVGO is 0.07, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2009

0.24

The correlation between PATK and AVGO shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (1 year) to 0.30 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PATK:

$2.72B

AVGO:

$1.85T

EPS

PATK:

$4.19

AVGO:

$6.01

PE Ratio

PATK:

19.71

AVGO:

64.77

PS Ratio

PATK:

0.74

AVGO:

25.16

PB Ratio

PATK:

2.55

AVGO:

21.65

Total Revenue (TTM)

PATK:

$3.94B

AVGO:

$75.47B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PATK:

$908.07M

AVGO:

$50.53B

EBITDA (TTM)

PATK:

$435.97M

AVGO:

$42.03B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PATK vs. AVGO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PATK
PATK Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
PATK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PATK Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
PATK Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
PATK Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
PATK Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

AVGO
AVGO Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
AVGO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVGO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVGO Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
AVGO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVGO Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PATK vs. AVGO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Patrick Industries, Inc. (PATK) and Broadcom Inc. (AVGO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PATKAVGODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

1.16

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.32

1.17

-1.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.60

2.34

-2.95

PATK vs. AVGO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PATK Sharpe Ratio is -0.38, which is lower than the AVGO Sharpe Ratio of 0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PATK and AVGO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PATK vs. AVGO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PATK drawdown since its inception was -98.61%, which is greater than AVGO's maximum drawdown of -48.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PATK and AVGO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PATKAVGODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.61%

-48.30%

-50.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.87%

-28.67%

-14.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.87%

-41.15%

-1.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.75%

-41.15%

-8.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.62%

-48.30%

-24.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-42.87%

-19.04%

-23.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.89%

-8.08%

-23.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.81%

14.34%

+8.47%

Volatility

PATK vs. AVGO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Patrick Industries, Inc. (PATK) is 9.99%, while Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) has a volatility of 12.66%. This indicates that PATK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVGO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PATKAVGODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.99%

12.66%

-2.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.52%

34.37%

-4.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.25%

47.48%

-11.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.54%

43.94%

-6.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.23%

39.72%

+6.51%

Dividends

PATK vs. AVGO - Dividend Comparison

PATK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%, more than AVGO's 0.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AVGO
Broadcom Inc.
0.65%0.70%0.94%1.71%3.02%2.24%3.05%3.54%3.11%1.87%1.43%1.13%
PATK
Patrick Industries, Inc.
2.19%1.54%1.81%1.89%2.38%1.45%1.51%0.48%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

PATK vs. AVGO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Patrick Industries, Inc. and Broadcom Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

PATK vs. AVGO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Patrick Industries, Inc. and Broadcom Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

PATK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Patrick Industries, Inc. reported a gross profit of 247.58M and revenue of 1.04B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.8%.

AVGO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Broadcom Inc. reported a gross profit of 14.92B and revenue of 22.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.2%.

PATK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Patrick Industries, Inc. reported an operating income of 77.04M and revenue of 1.04B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.4%.

AVGO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Broadcom Inc. reported an operating income of 10.87B and revenue of 22.19B, resulting in an operating margin of 49.0%.

PATK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Patrick Industries, Inc. reported a net income of 43.42M and revenue of 1.04B, resulting in a net margin of 4.2%.

AVGO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Broadcom Inc. reported a net income of 9.31B and revenue of 22.19B, resulting in a net margin of 42.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PATK and AVGO have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVGO has higher volatility (12.66%) compared to PATK (9.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PATK dropped -98.61% vs AVGO's -48.30%.

AVGO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.71 vs -0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PATK and AVGO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer