PATK vs. ET
Compare and contrast key facts about Patrick Industries, Inc. (PATK) and Energy Transfer LP (ET).
Performance
PATK vs. ET - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PATK vs. ET - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PATK Patrick Industries, Inc. | 4.56% | 32.70% | 26.49% | 69.62% | -23.07% | 19.72% | 32.77% | 77.91% | -57.37% | 36.53% |
ET Energy Transfer LP | 17.51% | -9.37% | 53.87% | 27.87% | 55.74% | 42.96% | -44.92% | 5.88% | -17.74% | -4.66% |
Fundamentals
PATK:
$3.98B
ET:
$69.42B
PATK:
$3.90
ET:
$1.37
PATK:
28.94
ET:
13.90
PATK:
0.99
ET:
0.82
PATK:
3.36
ET:
1.42
PATK:
$3.95B
ET:
$82.63B
PATK:
$912.86M
ET:
$18.01B
PATK:
$293.54M
ET:
$14.93B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PATK achieves a 4.56% return, which is significantly lower than ET's 17.51% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PATK having a 20.14% annualized return and ET not far ahead at 20.33%.
PATK
- 1D
- 1.73%
- 1M
- -8.75%
- YTD
- 4.56%
- 6M
- 10.61%
- 1Y
- 34.89%
- 3Y*
- 37.62%
- 5Y*
- 16.10%
- 10Y*
- 20.14%
ET
- 1D
- -1.45%
- 1M
- -0.42%
- YTD
- 17.51%
- 6M
- 16.34%
- 1Y
- 9.61%
- 3Y*
- 24.91%
- 5Y*
- 29.13%
- 10Y*
- 20.33%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PATK vs. ET — Risk / Return Rank
PATK
ET
PATK vs. ET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Patrick Industries, Inc. (PATK) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PATK | ET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.03 | 0.41 | +0.63 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.68 | 0.72 | +0.96 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.10 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.31 | 0.60 | +0.71 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.77 | 1.67 | +2.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PATK | ET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.03 | 0.41 | +0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | 1.15 | -0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | 0.56 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.35 | -0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between PATK and ET is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
PATK vs. ET - Dividend Comparison
PATK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.54%, less than ET's 6.97% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PATK Patrick Industries, Inc. | 1.54% | 1.54% | 1.81% | 1.89% | 2.38% | 1.45% | 1.51% | 0.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ET Energy Transfer LP | 6.97% | 7.97% | 6.51% | 8.95% | 7.33% | 7.41% | 17.27% | 9.51% | 9.24% | 6.66% | 5.90% | 7.42% |
Drawdowns
PATK vs. ET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PATK drawdown since its inception was -98.61%, which is greater than ET's maximum drawdown of -87.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PATK and ET.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PATK | ET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.61% | -87.81% | -10.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.23% | -17.33% | -9.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.63% | -25.82% | -28.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -72.62% | -72.82% | +0.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.21% | -3.30% | -18.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.85% | -25.95% | -5.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.50% | 6.24% | +3.26% |
Volatility
PATK vs. ET - Volatility Comparison
Patrick Industries, Inc. (PATK) has a higher volatility of 9.08% compared to Energy Transfer LP (ET) at 5.02%. This indicates that PATK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PATK | ET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.08% | 5.02% | +4.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.60% | 11.78% | +9.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.93% | 23.83% | +10.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.88% | 25.47% | +11.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.79% | 36.63% | +9.16% |
Financials
PATK vs. ET - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Patrick Industries, Inc. and Energy Transfer LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PATK vs. ET - Profitability Comparison
PATK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Patrick Industries, Inc. reported a gross profit of 212.67M and revenue of 924.17M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.0%.
ET - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Energy Transfer LP reported a gross profit of 5.78B and revenue of 22.41B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.8%.
PATK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Patrick Industries, Inc. reported an operating income of 57.41M and revenue of 924.17M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.2%.
ET - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Energy Transfer LP reported an operating income of 2.37B and revenue of 22.41B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.6%.
PATK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Patrick Industries, Inc. reported a net income of 29.08M and revenue of 924.17M, resulting in a net margin of 3.2%.
ET - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Energy Transfer LP reported a net income of 1.46B and revenue of 22.41B, resulting in a net margin of 6.5%.