PATK vs. ET
Compare and contrast key facts about Patrick Industries, Inc. (PATK) and Energy Transfer LP (ET).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: PATK or ET.
Correlation
The correlation between PATK and ET is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
PATK vs. ET - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
PATK:
0.91
ET:
2.54
PATK:
1.43
ET:
3.58
PATK:
1.17
ET:
1.45
PATK:
1.38
ET:
2.14
PATK:
3.88
ET:
19.73
PATK:
7.70%
ET:
2.17%
PATK:
32.90%
ET:
16.86%
PATK:
-99.06%
ET:
-87.81%
PATK:
-13.73%
ET:
-8.01%
Fundamentals
PATK:
$2.96B
ET:
$63.82B
PATK:
$4.64
ET:
$1.36
PATK:
18.97
ET:
13.71
PATK:
1.88
ET:
0.66
PATK:
$3.65B
ET:
$83.66B
PATK:
$760.87M
ET:
$12.71B
PATK:
$436.33M
ET:
$14.83B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PATK achieves a 28.11% return, which is significantly lower than ET's 43.51% return. Over the past 10 years, PATK has outperformed ET with an annualized return of 12.58%, while ET has yielded a comparatively lower 3.91% annualized return.
PATK
28.11%
-2.24%
19.08%
31.38%
21.82%
12.58%
ET
43.51%
1.73%
20.95%
44.35%
17.23%
3.91%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
PATK vs. ET - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Patrick Industries, Inc. (PATK) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
PATK vs. ET - Dividend Comparison
PATK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, less than ET's 6.98% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PATK Patrick Industries, Inc. | 2.59% | 1.89% | 2.38% | 1.45% | 1.51% | 0.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ET Energy Transfer LP | 6.98% | 8.95% | 7.33% | 7.41% | 17.27% | 9.51% | 9.24% | 6.66% | 5.90% | 7.42% | 2.61% | 3.19% |
Drawdowns
PATK vs. ET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PATK drawdown since its inception was -99.06%, which is greater than ET's maximum drawdown of -87.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PATK and ET. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
PATK vs. ET - Volatility Comparison
Patrick Industries, Inc. (PATK) has a higher volatility of 8.68% compared to Energy Transfer LP (ET) at 7.57%. This indicates that PATK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
PATK vs. ET - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Patrick Industries, Inc. and Energy Transfer LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities