PATK vs. ET
Compare and contrast key facts about Patrick Industries, Inc. (PATK) and Energy Transfer LP (ET).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: PATK or ET.
Correlation
The correlation between PATK and ET is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
PATK vs. ET - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
PATK:
0.30
ET:
0.61
PATK:
0.74
ET:
1.02
PATK:
1.09
ET:
1.14
PATK:
0.49
ET:
0.70
PATK:
1.23
ET:
2.29
PATK:
9.41%
ET:
7.51%
PATK:
35.50%
ET:
27.33%
PATK:
-99.06%
ET:
-87.81%
PATK:
-15.11%
ET:
-15.44%
Fundamentals
PATK:
$2.78B
ET:
$59.06B
PATK:
$4.16
ET:
$1.32
PATK:
19.90
ET:
13.04
PATK:
1.88
ET:
0.77
PATK:
0.73
ET:
0.72
PATK:
2.39
ET:
1.69
PATK:
$3.79B
ET:
$82.06B
PATK:
$835.35M
ET:
$14.68B
PATK:
$390.48M
ET:
$11.63B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PATK achieves a 0.06% return, which is significantly higher than ET's -9.01% return. Over the past 10 years, PATK has outperformed ET with an annualized return of 9.24%, while ET has yielded a comparatively lower 1.39% annualized return.
PATK
0.06%
3.22%
0.27%
10.83%
25.29%
9.24%
ET
-9.01%
10.25%
3.04%
16.23%
28.18%
1.39%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
PATK vs. ET — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
PATK
ET
PATK vs. ET - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Patrick Industries, Inc. (PATK) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
PATK vs. ET - Dividend Comparison
PATK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.66%, less than ET's 7.53% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PATK Patrick Industries, Inc. | 2.66% | 2.61% | 1.89% | 2.38% | 1.45% | 1.51% | 0.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ET Energy Transfer LP | 7.53% | 6.51% | 8.96% | 7.33% | 7.44% | 17.28% | 9.51% | 9.24% | 6.66% | 5.90% | 7.42% | 2.61% |
Drawdowns
PATK vs. ET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PATK drawdown since its inception was -99.06%, which is greater than ET's maximum drawdown of -87.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PATK and ET. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Loading data...
Volatility
PATK vs. ET - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Patrick Industries, Inc. (PATK) is 9.02%, while Energy Transfer LP (ET) has a volatility of 12.82%. This indicates that PATK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...
Financials
PATK vs. ET - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Patrick Industries, Inc. and Energy Transfer LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PATK vs. ET - Profitability Comparison
PATK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Patrick Industries, Inc. reported a gross profit of 228.59M and revenue of 1.00B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.8%.
ET - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Energy Transfer LP reported a gross profit of 4.08B and revenue of 21.02B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.4%.
PATK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Patrick Industries, Inc. reported an operating income of 65.57M and revenue of 1.00B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.5%.
ET - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Energy Transfer LP reported an operating income of 2.50B and revenue of 21.02B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.9%.
PATK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Patrick Industries, Inc. reported a net income of 38.24M and revenue of 1.00B, resulting in a net margin of 3.8%.
ET - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Energy Transfer LP reported a net income of 1.32B and revenue of 21.02B, resulting in a net margin of 6.3%.