PATK vs. CALF
PATK (Patrick Industries, Inc.) is a stock, while CALF (Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows ETF) is Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Index. Over the past 5 years, PATK returned 10.59%/yr vs 6.29%/yr for CALF. Their 0.65 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
PATK vs. CALF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PATK achieves a -23.21% return, which is significantly lower than CALF's 22.50% return.
PATK
- 1D
- -1.73%
- 1M
- -2.92%
- 6M
- -34.01%
- YTD
- -23.21%
- 1Y
- -14.40%
- 3Y*
- 15.06%
- 5Y*
- 10.59%
- 10Y*
- 12.75%
- ALL TIME*
- 15.17%
CALF
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- 4.89%
- 6M
- 19.77%
- YTD
- 22.50%
- 1Y
- 39.59%
- 3Y*
- 8.57%
- 5Y*
- 6.29%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.37%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $20.38M | $24.48M | $25.33M | |
| $47.70M | $60.01M | $55.68M |
PATK vs. CALF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PATK Patrick Industries, Inc. | -23.21% | 32.70% | 26.49% | 69.62% | -23.07% | 19.72% | 32.77% | 77.91% | -57.37% | 37.16% |
CALF Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows ETF | 22.50% | 2.33% | -7.41% | 35.43% | -15.20% | 40.68% | 16.55% | 18.18% | -10.06% | 5.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between PATK and CALF is 0.38, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2017 | 0.65 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PATK and CALF has dropped to 0.38 - well below their long-term average of 0.65, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PATK vs. CALF — Risk / Return Rank
PATK
CALF
PATK vs. CALF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Patrick Industries, Inc. (PATK) and Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows ETF (CALF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PATK | CALF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.40 | -0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.32 | 6.13 | -6.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.60 | 17.68 | -18.29 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PATK vs. CALF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PATK drawdown since its inception was -98.61%, which is greater than CALF's maximum drawdown of -47.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PATK and CALF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PATK | CALF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.61% | -47.58% | -51.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.87% | -6.02% | -36.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.87% | -34.22% | -8.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.75% | -34.22% | -15.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -72.62% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -42.87% | -1.88% | -40.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.89% | -10.57% | -21.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.81% | 2.09% | +20.72% |
Volatility
PATK vs. CALF - Volatility Comparison
Patrick Industries, Inc. (PATK) has a higher volatility of 9.99% compared to Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows ETF (CALF) at 5.09%. This indicates that PATK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CALF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PATK | CALF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.99% | 5.09% | +4.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.52% | 11.64% | +17.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.25% | 16.13% | +20.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.54% | 23.23% | +14.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.23% | 25.89% | +20.34% |
Dividends
PATK vs. CALF - Dividend Comparison
PATK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%, more than CALF's 1.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CALF Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows ETF | 1.12% | 1.43% | 1.07% | 1.18% | 0.85% | 2.63% | 0.82% | 0.99% | 1.39% | 0.70% |
PATK Patrick Industries, Inc. | 2.19% | 1.54% | 1.81% | 1.89% | 2.38% | 1.45% | 1.51% | 0.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PATK and CALF have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PATK has higher volatility (9.99%) compared to CALF (5.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PATK dropped -98.61% vs CALF's -47.58%.
CALF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs -0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PATK and CALF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer