PATH vs. PRF

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

PATH (UiPath Inc.) is a stock, while PRF (Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF) is Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the RAFI Fundamental Select US 1000 Index. Over the past 5 years, PATH returned -31.78%/yr vs 12.72%/yr for PRF. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

PATH vs. PRF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in UiPath Inc. (PATH) and Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF (PRF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PATH achieves a -37.10% return, which is significantly lower than PRF's 14.85% return.

PATH

• 1D: 1.48%
• 1M: -5.67%
• YTD: -37.10%
• 6M: -39.92%
• 1Y: -17.59%
• 3Y*: -13.14%
• 5Y*: -31.78%
• 10Y*: —

PRF

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.87%
• YTD: 14.85%
• 6M: 13.76%
• 1Y: 30.27%
• 3Y*: 20.99%
• 5Y*: 12.72%
• 10Y*: 13.99%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PATH vs. PRF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
PATH UiPath Inc.	-37.10%	28.95%	-48.83%	95.44%	-70.53%	-34.15%
PRF Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF	14.85%	18.33%	16.73%	15.72%	-7.79%	12.43%

Correlation

The correlation between PATH and PRF is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.21
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.45
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.47
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2021	0.45

Over the past year, the correlation between PATH and PRF has dropped to 0.21 - well below their long-term average of 0.45, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

PATH vs. PRF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PATH

PATH Risk / Return Rank: 32
PATH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
PATH Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
PATH Omega Ratio Rank: 32
PATH Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
PATH Martin Ratio Rank: 32

PRF

PRF Risk / Return Rank: 90
PRF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
PRF Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
PRF Omega Ratio Rank: 89
PRF Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
PRF Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PATH vs. PRF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UiPath Inc. (PATH) and Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF (PRF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PATH	PRF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.28	2.78	-3.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.00	3.84	-3.84
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.00	1.50	-0.50
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.34	4.61	-4.96
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.59	18.77	-19.37

PATH vs. PRF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PATH Sharpe Ratio is -0.28, which is lower than the PRF Sharpe Ratio of 2.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PATH and PRF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PATH vs. PRF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PATH drawdown since its inception was -88.98%, which is greater than PRF's maximum drawdown of -60.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PATH and PRF.

Drawdown Indicators

	PATH	PRF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-88.98%	-60.35%	-28.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-51.37%	-6.59%	-44.78%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-65.10%	-15.82%	-49.28%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-86.84%	-19.72%	-67.12%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-38.16%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-87.89%	-1.37%	-86.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-73.81%	-6.91%	-66.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	29.71%	1.62%	+28.09%

Volatility

PATH vs. PRF - Volatility Comparison

UiPath Inc. (PATH) has a higher volatility of 16.68% compared to Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF (PRF) at 3.63%. This indicates that PATH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PATH	PRF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.68%	3.63%	+13.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	42.37%	8.23%	+34.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	63.60%	10.96%	+52.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	63.46%	15.20%	+48.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	64.04%	17.64%	+46.40%

Dividends

PATH vs. PRF - Dividend Comparison

PATH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PRF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PATH UiPath Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PRF Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF	1.39%	1.59%	1.78%	1.84%	2.01%	1.58%	1.97%	1.99%	2.25%	1.58%	2.17%	2.25%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PATH and PRF in my portfolio?

PATH and PRF have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PATH or PRF?

PATH has higher volatility (16.68%) compared to PRF (3.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PATH dropped -88.98% vs PRF's -60.35%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PRF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.78 vs -0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.