PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAPI vs. BUCK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PAPI vs. BUCK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Parametric Equity Premium Income ETF (PAPI) and Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAPI achieves a 6.49% return, which is significantly higher than BUCK's 1.99% return.


PAPI

1D
0.64%
1M
0.17%
YTD
6.49%
6M
6.38%
1Y
13.61%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BUCK

1D
0.09%
1M
0.43%
YTD
1.99%
6M
1.92%
1Y
7.46%
3Y*
5.27%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAPI vs. BUCK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
PAPI
Parametric Equity Premium Income ETF
6.49%6.33%8.90%5.36%
BUCK
Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF
1.99%4.13%7.25%0.54%

Correlation

The correlation between PAPI and BUCK is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2023

0.12

PAPI vs. BUCK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PAPI
BUCK

Technology

12.5%

-

Consumer Cyclical

12.1%

-

Energy

11.6%

-

Healthcare

10.7%

-

Utilities

10.1%

-

Consumer Defensive

10.1%

-

Financial Services

9.9%
100.0%

Industrials

9.9%

-

Basic Materials

7.8%

-

Communication Services

5.4%

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

PAPI
12.5%
BUCK

-

Consumer Cyclical

PAPI
12.1%
BUCK

-

Energy

PAPI
11.6%
BUCK

-

Healthcare

PAPI
10.7%
BUCK

-

Utilities

PAPI
10.1%
BUCK

-

Consumer Defensive

PAPI
10.1%
BUCK

-

Financial Services

PAPI
9.9%
BUCK
100.0%

Industrials

PAPI
9.9%
BUCK

-

Basic Materials

PAPI
7.8%
BUCK

-

Communication Services

PAPI
5.4%
BUCK

-

Real Estate

PAPI

-

BUCK

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PAPI vs. BUCK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAPI
PAPI Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
PAPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAPI Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
PAPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAPI Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

BUCK
BUCK Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
BUCK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUCK Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUCK Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
BUCK Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUCK Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAPI vs. BUCK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Parametric Equity Premium Income ETF (PAPI) and Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PAPIBUCKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.51

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.99

5.73

-3.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.35

30.33

-24.98

PAPI vs. BUCK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAPI Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is lower than the BUCK Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAPI and BUCK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PAPIBUCKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.31

2.42

-1.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.90

1.48

-0.58

Drawdowns

PAPI vs. BUCK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAPI drawdown since its inception was -14.27%, which is greater than BUCK's maximum drawdown of -5.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAPI and BUCK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PAPIBUCKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.27%

-5.43%

-8.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.86%

-1.31%

-5.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.45%

0.00%

-4.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.73%

-0.49%

-2.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.55%

0.25%

+2.30%

Volatility

PAPI vs. BUCK - Volatility Comparison

Parametric Equity Premium Income ETF (PAPI) has a higher volatility of 2.20% compared to Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK) at 0.70%. This indicates that PAPI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUCK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PAPIBUCKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.20%

0.70%

+1.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.02%

1.52%

+5.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.47%

3.14%

+7.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.76%

3.48%

+8.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.76%

3.48%

+8.28%

PAPI vs. BUCK - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAPI has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than BUCK's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

PAPI vs. BUCK - Dividend Comparison

PAPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.57%, more than BUCK's 7.41% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BUCK
Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF
7.41%7.59%8.84%4.84%0.59%
PAPI
Parametric Equity Premium Income ETF
7.57%7.59%7.07%1.45%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PAPI and BUCK have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PAPI has higher volatility (2.20%) compared to BUCK (0.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAPI dropped -14.27% vs BUCK's -5.43%.

On 1-year performance, PAPI leads with 13.61% vs 7.46% for BUCK. On fees, PAPI is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, BUCK has been the lower-risk option at 0.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, PAPI has performed better with a 13.61% return vs 7.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PAPI is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for BUCK.

PAPI has the higher dividend yield at 7.57%, compared with 7.41% for BUCK.

PAPI is categorized as Derivative Income, while BUCK is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Morgan Stanley and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for PAPI and 0.35% for BUCK.

BUCK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PAPI and BUCK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer