PAOFX vs. FRAMX
Compare and contrast key facts about T. Rowe Price Target 2050 Fund (PAOFX) and Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class A (FRAMX).
PAOFX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Aug 19, 2013. FRAMX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Aug 30, 2007.
Performance
PAOFX vs. FRAMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PAOFX vs. FRAMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAOFX T. Rowe Price Target 2050 Fund | -3.53% | 17.86% | 13.37% | 19.70% | -19.27% | 16.11% | 17.65% | 23.85% | -7.37% | 19.79% |
FRAMX Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class A | -0.57% | 9.55% | 4.04% | 7.80% | -11.87% | 2.52% | 8.30% | 10.28% | -2.05% | 6.82% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PAOFX achieves a -3.53% return, which is significantly lower than FRAMX's -0.57% return. Over the past 10 years, PAOFX has outperformed FRAMX with an annualized return of 9.47%, while FRAMX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.65% annualized return.
PAOFX
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- -8.96%
- YTD
- -3.53%
- 6M
- -0.95%
- 1Y
- 13.51%
- 3Y*
- 13.30%
- 5Y*
- 6.54%
- 10Y*
- 9.47%
FRAMX
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- -3.20%
- YTD
- -0.57%
- 6M
- 0.62%
- 1Y
- 6.78%
- 3Y*
- 5.66%
- 5Y*
- 2.13%
- 10Y*
- 3.65%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PAOFX vs. FRAMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PAOFX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than FRAMX's 0.70% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PAOFX vs. FRAMX — Risk / Return Rank
PAOFX
FRAMX
PAOFX vs. FRAMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Target 2050 Fund (PAOFX) and Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class A (FRAMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PAOFX | FRAMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.91 | 1.50 | -0.59 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.36 | 2.09 | -0.72 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.30 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.00 | 2.00 | -1.00 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.62 | 8.06 | -3.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PAOFX | FRAMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 | 1.50 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | 0.41 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | 0.82 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.49 | +0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between PAOFX and FRAMX is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PAOFX vs. FRAMX - Dividend Comparison
PAOFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.79%, more than FRAMX's 2.91% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAOFX T. Rowe Price Target 2050 Fund | 4.79% | 4.62% | 2.43% | 2.48% | 5.30% | 3.47% | 2.61% | 4.21% | 5.34% | 2.31% | 2.31% | 2.44% |
FRAMX Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class A | 2.91% | 2.77% | 2.77% | 2.58% | 4.26% | 3.31% | 2.23% | 2.37% | 4.40% | 8.26% | 1.42% | 1.42% |
Drawdowns
PAOFX vs. FRAMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PAOFX drawdown since its inception was -30.94%, smaller than the maximum FRAMX drawdown of -33.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAOFX and FRAMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PAOFX | FRAMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.94% | -33.94% | +3.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.09% | -3.45% | -7.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.78% | -16.31% | -11.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.94% | -16.31% | -14.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.30% | -3.20% | -6.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.88% | -3.87% | -1.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.69% | 0.86% | +1.83% |
Volatility
PAOFX vs. FRAMX - Volatility Comparison
T. Rowe Price Target 2050 Fund (PAOFX) has a higher volatility of 4.79% compared to Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class A (FRAMX) at 1.96%. This indicates that PAOFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRAMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PAOFX | FRAMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.79% | 1.96% | +2.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.74% | 2.86% | +5.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.39% | 4.59% | +10.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.48% | 5.21% | +9.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.62% | 4.47% | +10.15% |