PAOFX vs. PADLX
PAOFX (T. Rowe Price Target 2050 Fund) and PADLX (Putnam Retirement Advantage Maturity Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 5 years, PAOFX returned 8.30%/yr vs 4.05%/yr for PADLX. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PAOFX charges 0.88%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for PADLX.
Performance
PAOFX vs. PADLX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PAOFX achieves a 10.49% return, which is significantly higher than PADLX's 4.70% return.
PAOFX
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 3.40%
- YTD
- 10.49%
- 6M
- 11.60%
- 1Y
- 24.24%
- 3Y*
- 17.49%
- 5Y*
- 8.30%
- 10Y*
- 10.73%
PADLX
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 1.57%
- YTD
- 4.70%
- 6M
- 5.52%
- 1Y
- 13.99%
- 3Y*
- 10.36%
- 5Y*
- 4.05%
- 10Y*
- —
PAOFX vs. PADLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAOFX T. Rowe Price Target 2050 Fund | 10.49% | 17.86% | 13.37% | 19.70% | -19.27% | 16.11% | 16.74% |
PADLX Putnam Retirement Advantage Maturity Fund | 4.70% | 10.83% | 8.34% | 11.01% | -12.54% | 2.93% | 7.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between PAOFX and PADLX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2020 | 0.82 |
The correlation between PAOFX and PADLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PAOFX vs. PADLX — Risk / Return Rank
PAOFX
PADLX
PAOFX vs. PADLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Target 2050 Fund (PAOFX) and Putnam Retirement Advantage Maturity Fund (PADLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PAOFX | PADLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.23 | 3.10 | -0.86 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.16 | 4.61 | -1.45 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.62 | -0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.59 | 3.87 | -1.28 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.47 | 16.98 | -5.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PAOFX | PADLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.23 | 3.10 | -0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | 0.61 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.70 | 0.65 | +0.05 |
Drawdowns
PAOFX vs. PADLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PAOFX drawdown since its inception was -30.94%, which is greater than PADLX's maximum drawdown of -18.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAOFX and PADLX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PAOFX | PADLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.94% | -18.87% | -12.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.30% | -3.63% | -5.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.10% | -6.63% | -8.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.78% | -18.87% | -8.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.94% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.09% | +0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.83% | -4.84% | +0.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.10% | 0.83% | +1.27% |
Volatility
PAOFX vs. PADLX - Volatility Comparison
T. Rowe Price Target 2050 Fund (PAOFX) has a higher volatility of 3.34% compared to Putnam Retirement Advantage Maturity Fund (PADLX) at 1.57%. This indicates that PAOFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PADLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PAOFX | PADLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.34% | 1.57% | +1.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.52% | 3.62% | +5.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.60% | 4.55% | +7.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.57% | 6.65% | +7.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.68% | 7.51% | +7.17% |
PAOFX vs. PADLX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PAOFX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than PADLX's 0.22% expense ratio.
Dividends
PAOFX vs. PADLX - Dividend Comparison
PAOFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.18%, less than PADLX's 4.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PADLX Putnam Retirement Advantage Maturity Fund | 4.95% | 5.03% | 3.71% | 2.91% | 1.01% | 1.45% | 1.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PAOFX T. Rowe Price Target 2050 Fund | 4.18% | 4.62% | 2.43% | 2.48% | 5.30% | 3.47% | 2.61% | 4.21% | 5.34% | 2.31% | 2.31% | 2.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PAOFX and PADLX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PAOFX has higher volatility (3.34%) compared to PADLX (1.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAOFX dropped -30.94% vs PADLX's -18.87%.
PADLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.10 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PAOFX and PADLX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer