PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAOFX vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PAOFX vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Target 2050 Fund (PAOFX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAOFX achieves a 8.65% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 8.08% return. Over the past 10 years, PAOFX has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 10.94%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.60% annualized return.


PAOFX

1D
-1.62%
1M
-0.41%
YTD
8.65%
6M
7.85%
1Y
20.18%
3Y*
16.57%
5Y*
7.75%
10Y*
10.94%

VOO

1D
-0.10%
1M
-1.44%
YTD
8.08%
6M
6.78%
1Y
22.23%
3Y*
20.75%
5Y*
13.02%
10Y*
15.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAOFX vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PAOFX
T. Rowe Price Target 2050 Fund
8.65%17.86%13.37%19.70%-19.27%16.11%17.65%23.85%-7.37%19.79%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
8.08%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between PAOFX and VOO is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2013

0.93

The correlation between PAOFX and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PAOFX vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAOFX
PAOFX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
PAOFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAOFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAOFX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
PAOFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAOFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAOFX vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Target 2050 Fund (PAOFX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PAOFXVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.33

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.40

2.51

-0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.29

11.16

-0.87

PAOFX vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAOFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAOFX and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PAOFX vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAOFX drawdown since its inception was -30.94%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAOFX and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PAOFXVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.94%

-33.99%

+3.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.30%

-8.90%

-0.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.10%

-18.69%

+3.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.78%

-24.52%

-3.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.94%

-33.99%

+3.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.11%

-3.23%

+1.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.81%

-3.68%

-1.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.14%

2.00%

+0.14%

Volatility

PAOFX vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Target 2050 Fund (PAOFX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) have volatilities of 4.82% and 4.80%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PAOFXVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.82%

4.80%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.28%

9.79%

+0.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.34%

12.43%

-0.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.69%

16.91%

-2.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.66%

18.02%

-3.36%

PAOFX vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAOFX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

PAOFX vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

PAOFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.25%, more than VOO's 1.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PAOFX
T. Rowe Price Target 2050 Fund
4.25%4.62%2.43%2.48%5.30%3.47%2.61%4.21%5.34%2.31%2.31%2.44%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.05%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, PAOFX and VOO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PAOFX has higher volatility (4.82%) compared to VOO (4.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAOFX dropped -30.94% vs VOO's -33.99%.

PAOFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PAOFX and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer