PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PANW vs. FDL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PANW vs. FDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PANW achieves a 51.60% return, which is significantly higher than FDL's 14.21% return. Over the past 10 years, PANW has outperformed FDL with an annualized return of 28.21%, while FDL has yielded a comparatively lower 11.28% annualized return.


PANW

1D
-0.42%
1M
51.78%
YTD
51.60%
6M
42.71%
1Y
43.89%
3Y*
35.04%
5Y*
36.21%
10Y*
28.21%

FDL

1D
0.78%
1M
0.32%
YTD
14.21%
6M
15.52%
1Y
25.50%
3Y*
19.57%
5Y*
12.69%
10Y*
11.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PANW vs. FDL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PANW
Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
51.60%1.23%23.41%111.32%-24.81%56.66%53.68%22.78%29.95%15.91%
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
14.21%14.79%17.98%2.94%6.66%26.10%-4.30%24.41%-5.99%12.02%

Correlation

The correlation between PANW and FDL is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2012

0.21

The correlation between PANW and FDL shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PANW vs. FDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PANW
PANW Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
PANW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PANW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
PANW Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
PANW Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
PANW Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

FDL
FDL Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDL Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDL Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PANW vs. FDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PANWFDLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.40

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.22

5.99

-4.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.79

14.59

-11.80

PANW vs. FDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PANW Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is lower than the FDL Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PANW and FDL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PANWFDLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.15

2.27

-1.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

0.89

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

0.66

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

0.45

+0.27

Drawdowns

PANW vs. FDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PANW drawdown since its inception was -47.98%, smaller than the maximum FDL drawdown of -65.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PANW and FDL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PANWFDLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.98%

-65.93%

+17.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.01%

-4.27%

-31.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.01%

-12.24%

-23.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.01%

-16.46%

-19.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.98%

-41.40%

-6.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.07%

-1.41%

-5.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.69%

-9.66%

-5.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.80%

1.75%

+14.05%

Volatility

PANW vs. FDL - Volatility Comparison

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW) has a higher volatility of 16.96% compared to First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) at 2.95%. This indicates that PANW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PANWFDLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.96%

2.95%

+14.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.66%

7.85%

+23.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.38%

11.30%

+27.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.63%

14.31%

+27.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.57%

17.11%

+21.46%

Dividends

PANW vs. FDL - Dividend Comparison

PANW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FDL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.65%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
3.65%4.04%4.96%4.58%3.58%4.59%4.48%3.75%3.97%3.18%2.93%3.65%
PANW
Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PANW and FDL have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PANW has higher volatility (16.96%) compared to FDL (2.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PANW dropped -47.98% vs FDL's -65.93%.

FDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PANW and FDL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer