PAMC vs. AMID

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

PAMC (Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF) and AMID (Argent Mid Cap ETF) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. PAMC is passively managed, while AMID is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, PAMC returned 18.49%/yr vs 11.94%/yr for AMID. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PAMC charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for AMID.

Performance

PAMC vs. AMID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC) and Argent Mid Cap ETF (AMID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAMC achieves a 18.25% return, which is significantly higher than AMID's 6.47% return.

PAMC

• 1D: -1.11%
• 1M: 3.39%
• YTD: 18.25%
• 6M: 15.73%
• 1Y: 29.68%
• 3Y*: 18.49%
• 5Y*: 9.24%
• 10Y*: —

AMID

• 1D: -1.06%
• 1M: 3.01%
• YTD: 6.47%
• 6M: 4.43%
• 1Y: 9.43%
• 3Y*: 11.94%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAMC vs. AMID - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
PAMC Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF	18.25%	1.54%	26.20%	19.30%	-5.97%
AMID Argent Mid Cap ETF	6.47%	-1.39%	13.06%	31.26%	-7.01%

Correlation

The correlation between PAMC and AMID is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 2022	0.90

The correlation between PAMC and AMID has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

PAMC vs. AMID - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PAMC	AMID
Industrials	25.8%	32.5%
Technology	16.1%	23.8%
Financial Services	15.8%	16.2%
Consumer Cyclical	11.8%	9.5%
Energy	9.8%	3.9%
Basic Materials	5.6%	3.6%
Real Estate	4.0%	3.3%
Consumer Defensive	3.8%	2.3%
Healthcare	3.4%	5.7%
Utilities	3.1%	2.6%
Communication Services	0.7%	-

Return for Risk

PAMC vs. AMID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAMC

PAMC Risk / Return Rank: 55
PAMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
PAMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
PAMC Omega Ratio Rank: 48
PAMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
PAMC Martin Ratio Rank: 64

AMID

AMID Risk / Return Rank: 19
AMID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
AMID Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
AMID Omega Ratio Rank: 17
AMID Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
AMID Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAMC vs. AMID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC) and Argent Mid Cap ETF (AMID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PAMC	AMID	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.58	0.57	+1.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.29	0.94	+1.35
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.11	+0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.91	0.77	+2.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.77	2.66	+8.11

PAMC vs. AMID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAMC Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is higher than the AMID Sharpe Ratio of 0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAMC and AMID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PAMC vs. AMID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAMC drawdown since its inception was -27.04%, which is greater than AMID's maximum drawdown of -23.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAMC and AMID.

Drawdown Indicators

	PAMC	AMID	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.04%	-23.32%	-3.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.24%	-12.31%	+2.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.07%	-23.32%	-2.75%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.61%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.11%	-4.40%	+3.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.41%	-6.18%	-1.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.76%	3.55%	-0.79%

Volatility

PAMC vs. AMID - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC) and Argent Mid Cap ETF (AMID) have volatilities of 5.44% and 5.45%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PAMC	AMID	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.44%	5.45%	-0.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.37%	12.67%	+1.70%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.90%	16.59%	+2.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.40%	19.13%	+1.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.72%	19.13%	+1.59%

PAMC vs. AMID - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAMC has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than AMID's 0.52% expense ratio.

Dividends

PAMC vs. AMID - Dividend Comparison

PAMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, more than AMID's 0.34% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
AMID Argent Mid Cap ETF	0.34%	0.36%	0.33%	0.43%	0.25%	0.00%	0.00%
PAMC Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF	1.10%	1.11%	0.97%	0.69%	1.29%	0.36%	0.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PAMC and AMID in my portfolio?

PAMC and AMID have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PAMC or AMID?

AMID has higher volatility (5.45%) compared to PAMC (5.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAMC dropped -27.04% vs AMID's -23.32%.

Which ETF is better, PAMC or AMID?

On 3-year performance, PAMC leads with 18.49% vs 11.94% for AMID. On fees, AMID is cheaper at 0.52% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PAMC or AMID?

Over the 3-year period, PAMC has performed better with a 18.49% return vs 11.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PAMC or AMID?

AMID is cheaper with a 0.52% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PAMC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PAMC or AMID?

PAMC has the higher dividend yield at 1.10%, compared with 0.34% for AMID.

What is the main difference between PAMC and AMID?

They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Argent. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PAMC and 0.52% for AMID.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PAMC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.