PALL vs. PPLT
Compare and contrast key facts about Aberdeen Standard Physical Palladium Shares ETF (PALL) and Aberdeen Standard Physical Platinum Shares ETF (PPLT).
PALL and PPLT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PALL is a passively managed fund by Aberdeen that tracks the performance of the Palladium London PM Fix ($/ozt). It was launched on Jan 6, 2010. PPLT is a passively managed fund by Aberdeen that tracks the performance of the Platinum London PM Fix ($/ozt). It was launched on Jan 8, 2010. Both PALL and PPLT are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
PALL vs. PPLT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PALL vs. PPLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PALL Aberdeen Standard Physical Palladium Shares ETF | -7.34% | 74.07% | -17.38% | -38.77% | -6.28% | -23.26% | 25.27% | 53.94% | 17.23% | 55.73% |
PPLT Aberdeen Standard Physical Platinum Shares ETF | -4.40% | 124.48% | -8.90% | -8.18% | 10.43% | -10.75% | 10.78% | 20.85% | -14.95% | 2.38% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PALL achieves a -7.34% return, which is significantly lower than PPLT's -4.40% return. Over the past 10 years, PALL has outperformed PPLT with an annualized return of 9.50%, while PPLT has yielded a comparatively lower 6.81% annualized return.
PALL
- 1D
- 5.15%
- 1M
- -17.05%
- YTD
- -7.34%
- 6M
- 17.99%
- 1Y
- 48.77%
- 3Y*
- -0.08%
- 5Y*
- -11.63%
- 10Y*
- 9.50%
PPLT
- 1D
- 3.49%
- 1M
- -17.00%
- YTD
- -4.40%
- 6M
- 24.74%
- 1Y
- 95.06%
- 3Y*
- 24.69%
- 5Y*
- 9.44%
- 10Y*
- 6.81%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PALL vs. PPLT - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both PALL and PPLT have an expense ratio of 0.60%.
Return for Risk
PALL vs. PPLT — Risk / Return Rank
PALL
PPLT
PALL vs. PPLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aberdeen Standard Physical Palladium Shares ETF (PALL) and Aberdeen Standard Physical Platinum Shares ETF (PPLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PALL | PPLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.01 | 1.95 | -0.94 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.48 | 2.20 | -0.72 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.34 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.51 | 2.85 | -1.34 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.55 | 8.64 | -4.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PALL | PPLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.01 | 1.95 | -0.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.28 | 0.30 | -0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 | 0.24 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 0.03 | +0.18 |
Correlation
The correlation between PALL and PPLT is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
PALL vs. PPLT - Dividend Comparison
Neither PALL nor PPLT has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
PALL vs. PPLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PALL drawdown since its inception was -73.63%, roughly equal to the maximum PPLT drawdown of -70.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PALL and PPLT.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PALL | PPLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.63% | -70.73% | -2.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.17% | -34.41% | +0.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -73.63% | -34.74% | -38.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.63% | -51.14% | -22.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -54.34% | -29.34% | -25.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.51% | -40.08% | +13.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.31% | 11.36% | -0.05% |
Volatility
PALL vs. PPLT - Volatility Comparison
Aberdeen Standard Physical Palladium Shares ETF (PALL) and Aberdeen Standard Physical Platinum Shares ETF (PPLT) have volatilities of 15.73% and 16.06%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PALL | PPLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.73% | 16.06% | -0.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.92% | 44.64% | -0.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.74% | 49.13% | -0.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.07% | 32.03% | +10.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.71% | 28.73% | +8.98% |