PALL vs. GSM
Compare and contrast key facts about Aberdeen Standard Physical Palladium Shares ETF (PALL) and Ferroglobe PLC (GSM).
PALL is a passively managed fund by Aberdeen that tracks the performance of the Palladium London PM Fix ($/ozt). It was launched on Jan 6, 2010.
Performance
PALL vs. GSM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PALL vs. GSM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PALL Aberdeen Standard Physical Palladium Shares ETF | -7.34% | 74.07% | -17.38% | -38.77% | -6.28% | -23.26% | 25.27% | 53.94% | 17.23% | 55.73% |
GSM Ferroglobe PLC | -10.85% | 23.75% | -40.95% | 69.09% | -38.00% | 278.66% | 74.47% | -40.88% | -90.06% | 49.58% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PALL achieves a -7.34% return, which is significantly higher than GSM's -10.85% return. Over the past 10 years, PALL has outperformed GSM with an annualized return of 9.50%, while GSM has yielded a comparatively lower -6.77% annualized return.
PALL
- 1D
- 5.15%
- 1M
- -17.05%
- YTD
- -7.34%
- 6M
- 17.99%
- 1Y
- 48.77%
- 3Y*
- -0.08%
- 5Y*
- -11.63%
- 10Y*
- 9.50%
GSM
- 1D
- -0.96%
- 1M
- -19.05%
- YTD
- -10.85%
- 6M
- -8.81%
- 1Y
- 12.61%
- 3Y*
- -4.96%
- 5Y*
- 1.69%
- 10Y*
- -6.77%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PALL vs. GSM — Risk / Return Rank
PALL
GSM
PALL vs. GSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aberdeen Standard Physical Palladium Shares ETF (PALL) and Ferroglobe PLC (GSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PALL | GSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.01 | 0.23 | +0.77 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.48 | 0.75 | +0.73 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.08 | +0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.51 | 0.45 | +1.06 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.55 | 1.10 | +3.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PALL | GSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.01 | 0.23 | +0.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.28 | 0.03 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 | -0.09 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | -0.03 | +0.24 |
Correlation
The correlation between PALL and GSM is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
PALL vs. GSM - Dividend Comparison
PALL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PALL Aberdeen Standard Physical Palladium Shares ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GSM Ferroglobe PLC | 1.38% | 1.21% | 1.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 7.55% | 0.00% | 2.95% | 2.98% |
Drawdowns
PALL vs. GSM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PALL drawdown since its inception was -73.63%, smaller than the maximum GSM drawdown of -98.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PALL and GSM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PALL | GSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.63% | -98.30% | +24.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.17% | -33.09% | -1.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -73.63% | -67.30% | -6.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.63% | -97.84% | +24.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -54.34% | -80.48% | +26.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.51% | -54.67% | +28.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.31% | 13.42% | -2.11% |
Volatility
PALL vs. GSM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Aberdeen Standard Physical Palladium Shares ETF (PALL) is 15.73%, while Ferroglobe PLC (GSM) has a volatility of 17.64%. This indicates that PALL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PALL | GSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.73% | 17.64% | -1.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.92% | 41.62% | +2.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.74% | 54.69% | -5.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.07% | 57.94% | -15.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.71% | 74.45% | -36.74% |