GSM vs. AAPL
Compare and contrast key facts about Ferroglobe PLC (GSM) and Apple Inc. (AAPL).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GSM or AAPL.
Key characteristics
| GSM | AAPL | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -17.13% | -4.63% |
| 1Y Return | 32.88% | 11.20% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 8.71% | 13.45% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 20.11% | 29.21% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | -11.01% | 25.69% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.73 | 0.49 |
| Daily Std Dev | 43.88% | 20.67% |
| Max Drawdown | -98.29% | -81.80% |
| Current Drawdown | -75.14% | -7.32% |
Fundamentals
| GSM | AAPL | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $980.28M | $2.61T |
| EPS | $0.46 | $6.43 |
| PE Ratio | 11.37 | 26.33 |
| PEG Ratio | 9.51 | 2.09 |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.65B | $385.71B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $1.31B | $170.78B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $295.76M | $130.11B |
Correlation
The correlation between GSM and AAPL is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
GSM vs. AAPL - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, GSM achieves a -17.13% return, which is significantly lower than AAPL's -4.63% return. Over the past 10 years, GSM has underperformed AAPL with an annualized return of -11.01%, while AAPL has yielded a comparatively higher 25.69% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GSM vs. AAPL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ferroglobe PLC (GSM) and Apple Inc. (AAPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GSM vs. AAPL - Dividend Comparison
GSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%, less than AAPL's 0.52% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSM Ferroglobe PLC | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 7.55% | 0.00% | 3.69% | 2.98% | 1.74% | 1.47% |
AAPL Apple Inc. | 0.52% | 0.49% | 0.70% | 0.49% | 0.61% | 1.04% | 1.79% | 1.45% | 1.93% | 1.93% | 1.67% | 2.10% |
Drawdowns
GSM vs. AAPL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSM drawdown since its inception was -98.29%, which is greater than AAPL's maximum drawdown of -81.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSM and AAPL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GSM vs. AAPL - Volatility Comparison
Ferroglobe PLC (GSM) has a higher volatility of 10.23% compared to Apple Inc. (AAPL) at 9.16%. This indicates that GSM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
GSM vs. AAPL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ferroglobe PLC and Apple Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities