PortfoliosLab logo
GSM vs. AAPL
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between GSM and AAPL is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

GSM vs. AAPL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ferroglobe PLC (GSM) and Apple Inc (AAPL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

GSM:

-0.80

AAPL:

0.36

Sortino Ratio

GSM:

-0.89

AAPL:

0.80

Omega Ratio

GSM:

0.90

AAPL:

1.11

Calmar Ratio

GSM:

-0.35

AAPL:

0.40

Martin Ratio

GSM:

-0.99

AAPL:

1.31

Ulcer Index

GSM:

30.63%

AAPL:

10.13%

Daily Std Dev

GSM:

43.17%

AAPL:

32.87%

Max Drawdown

GSM:

-98.28%

AAPL:

-81.80%

Current Drawdown

GSM:

-81.90%

AAPL:

-18.24%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GSM:

$716.64M

AAPL:

$3.16T

EPS

GSM:

-$0.23

AAPL:

$6.42

PEG Ratio

GSM:

9.51

AAPL:

2.14

PS Ratio

GSM:

0.46

AAPL:

7.88

PB Ratio

GSM:

1.07

AAPL:

47.24

Total Revenue (TTM)

GSM:

$1.56B

AAPL:

$400.37B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GSM:

$497.79M

AAPL:

$186.70B

EBITDA (TTM)

GSM:

$88.28M

AAPL:

$138.87B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSM achieves a 1.40% return, which is significantly higher than AAPL's -15.43% return. Over the past 10 years, GSM has underperformed AAPL with an annualized return of -14.35%, while AAPL has yielded a comparatively higher 21.87% annualized return.


GSM

YTD

1.40%

1M

11.63%

6M

-8.60%

1Y

-35.53%

5Y*

39.23%

10Y*

-14.35%

AAPL

YTD

-15.43%

1M

7.39%

6M

-5.88%

1Y

11.79%

5Y*

22.76%

10Y*

21.87%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

GSM vs. AAPL — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GSM is 1818
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GSM is 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GSM is 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GSM is 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GSM is 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GSM is 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

AAPL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AAPL is 6464
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AAPL is 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AAPL is 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AAPL is 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AAPL is 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AAPL is 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

GSM vs. AAPL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ferroglobe PLC (GSM) and Apple Inc (AAPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current GSM Sharpe Ratio is -0.80, which is lower than the AAPL Sharpe Ratio of 0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSM and AAPL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

GSM vs. AAPL - Dividend Comparison

GSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, more than AAPL's 0.48% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
GSM
Ferroglobe PLC
1.38%1.37%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%7.55%0.49%3.69%2.98%1.74%
AAPL
Apple Inc
0.48%0.40%0.49%0.70%0.49%0.61%1.04%1.79%1.45%1.93%1.93%1.67%

Drawdowns

GSM vs. AAPL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSM drawdown since its inception was -98.28%, which is greater than AAPL's maximum drawdown of -81.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSM and AAPL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

GSM vs. AAPL - Volatility Comparison

Ferroglobe PLC (GSM) has a higher volatility of 14.60% compared to Apple Inc (AAPL) at 9.68%. This indicates that GSM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

GSM vs. AAPL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ferroglobe PLC and Apple Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B100.00B120.00B20212022202320242025
307.18M
95.36B
(GSM) Total Revenue
(AAPL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

GSM vs. AAPL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Ferroglobe PLC and Apple Inc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%20212022202320242025
16.7%
47.1%
(GSM) Gross Margin
(AAPL) Gross Margin
GSM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Ferroglobe PLC reported a gross profit of 51.32M and revenue of 307.18M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 16.7%.

AAPL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Apple Inc reported a gross profit of 44.87B and revenue of 95.36B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 47.1%.

GSM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Ferroglobe PLC reported an operating income of -55.68M and revenue of 307.18M, resulting in an operating margin of -18.1%.

AAPL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Apple Inc reported an operating income of 29.59B and revenue of 95.36B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.0%.

GSM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Ferroglobe PLC reported a net income of -66.48M and revenue of 307.18M, resulting in a net margin of -21.6%.

AAPL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Apple Inc reported a net income of 24.78B and revenue of 95.36B, resulting in a net margin of 26.0%.