PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
GSM vs. JKS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between GSM and JKS is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.3

Performance

GSM vs. JKS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ferroglobe PLC (GSM) and JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd. (JKS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-40.00%-20.00%0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-29.13%
9.62%
GSM
JKS

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

GSM:

-0.81

JKS:

-0.24

Sortino Ratio

GSM:

-1.07

JKS:

0.16

Omega Ratio

GSM:

0.87

JKS:

1.02

Calmar Ratio

GSM:

-0.38

JKS:

-0.24

Martin Ratio

GSM:

-1.35

JKS:

-0.76

Ulcer Index

GSM:

23.37%

JKS:

24.33%

Daily Std Dev

GSM:

39.06%

JKS:

76.05%

Max Drawdown

GSM:

-98.29%

JKS:

-94.84%

Current Drawdown

GSM:

-81.03%

JKS:

-72.60%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GSM:

$764.69M

JKS:

$1.05B

EPS

GSM:

$0.21

JKS:

$0.68

PE Ratio

GSM:

19.38

JKS:

31.24

PEG Ratio

GSM:

9.51

JKS:

0.26

Total Revenue (TTM)

GSM:

$1.28B

JKS:

$81.39B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GSM:

$305.89M

JKS:

$10.62B

EBITDA (TTM)

GSM:

$126.75M

JKS:

$4.40B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSM achieves a 7.11% return, which is significantly higher than JKS's -14.70% return. Over the past 10 years, GSM has underperformed JKS with an annualized return of -11.86%, while JKS has yielded a comparatively higher 3.82% annualized return.


GSM

YTD

7.11%

1M

8.04%

6M

-29.13%

1Y

-32.50%

5Y*

32.02%

10Y*

-11.86%

JKS

YTD

-14.70%

1M

-16.61%

6M

9.63%

1Y

-19.65%

5Y*

1.00%

10Y*

3.82%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

GSM vs. JKS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GSM is 1212
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GSM is 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GSM is 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GSM is 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GSM is 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GSM is 99
Martin Ratio Rank

JKS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of JKS is 3434
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of JKS is 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of JKS is 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of JKS is 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of JKS is 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of JKS is 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

GSM vs. JKS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ferroglobe PLC (GSM) and JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd. (JKS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GSM, currently valued at -0.81, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.00-0.81-0.24
The chart of Sortino ratio for GSM, currently valued at -1.07, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-1.070.16
The chart of Omega ratio for GSM, currently valued at 0.87, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.871.02
The chart of Calmar ratio for GSM, currently valued at -0.38, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.38-0.24
The chart of Martin ratio for GSM, currently valued at -1.35, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.00-1.35-0.76
GSM
JKS

The current GSM Sharpe Ratio is -0.81, which is lower than the JKS Sharpe Ratio of -0.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSM and JKS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.50AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-0.81
-0.24
GSM
JKS

Dividends

GSM vs. JKS - Dividend Comparison

GSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, less than JKS's 7.06% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
GSM
Ferroglobe PLC
1.28%1.37%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%7.55%0.00%3.69%2.98%1.74%
JKS
JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd.
7.06%6.02%4.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

GSM vs. JKS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSM drawdown since its inception was -98.29%, roughly equal to the maximum JKS drawdown of -94.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSM and JKS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-75.00%-70.00%-65.00%-60.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-81.03%
-72.60%
GSM
JKS

Volatility

GSM vs. JKS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ferroglobe PLC (GSM) is 8.22%, while JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd. (JKS) has a volatility of 19.53%. This indicates that GSM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JKS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
8.22%
19.53%
GSM
JKS

Financials

GSM vs. JKS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ferroglobe PLC and JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab