PALL vs. BCI
Compare and contrast key facts about Aberdeen Standard Physical Palladium Shares ETF (PALL) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI).
PALL and BCI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PALL is a passively managed fund by Aberdeen that tracks the performance of the Palladium London PM Fix ($/ozt). It was launched on Jan 6, 2010. BCI is an actively managed fund by Aberdeen. It was launched on Mar 30, 2017.
Performance
PALL vs. BCI - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PALL vs. BCI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PALL Aberdeen Standard Physical Palladium Shares ETF | -7.34% | 74.07% | -17.38% | -38.77% | -6.28% | -23.26% | 25.27% | 53.94% | 17.23% | 32.87% |
BCI abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF | 24.37% | 15.07% | 5.47% | -8.79% | 15.09% | 26.18% | -2.77% | 7.06% | -11.21% | 2.94% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PALL achieves a -7.34% return, which is significantly lower than BCI's 24.37% return.
PALL
- 1D
- 5.15%
- 1M
- -17.05%
- YTD
- -7.34%
- 6M
- 17.99%
- 1Y
- 48.77%
- 3Y*
- -0.08%
- 5Y*
- -11.63%
- 10Y*
- 9.50%
BCI
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 11.37%
- YTD
- 24.37%
- 6M
- 31.23%
- 1Y
- 31.71%
- 3Y*
- 13.50%
- 5Y*
- 13.31%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PALL vs. BCI - Expense Ratio Comparison
PALL has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than BCI's 0.25% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PALL vs. BCI — Risk / Return Rank
PALL
BCI
PALL vs. BCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aberdeen Standard Physical Palladium Shares ETF (PALL) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PALL | BCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.01 | 1.87 | -0.86 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.48 | 2.46 | -0.98 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.35 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.51 | 3.52 | -2.02 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.55 | 9.71 | -5.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PALL | BCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.01 | 1.87 | -0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.28 | 0.80 | -1.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 0.48 | -0.27 |
Correlation
The correlation between PALL and BCI is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
PALL vs. BCI - Dividend Comparison
PALL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.26%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PALL Aberdeen Standard Physical Palladium Shares ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BCI abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF | 13.26% | 16.49% | 3.29% | 3.93% | 19.98% | 19.43% | 0.68% | 1.47% | 1.13% | 5.02% |
Drawdowns
PALL vs. BCI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PALL drawdown since its inception was -73.63%, which is greater than BCI's maximum drawdown of -32.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PALL and BCI.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PALL | BCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.63% | -32.69% | -40.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.17% | -9.28% | -24.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -73.63% | -26.50% | -47.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -54.34% | 0.00% | -54.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.51% | -12.19% | -14.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.31% | 3.37% | +7.94% |
Volatility
PALL vs. BCI - Volatility Comparison
Aberdeen Standard Physical Palladium Shares ETF (PALL) has a higher volatility of 15.73% compared to abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI) at 7.07%. This indicates that PALL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BCI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PALL | BCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.73% | 7.07% | +8.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.92% | 13.57% | +30.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.74% | 17.09% | +31.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.07% | 16.63% | +25.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.71% | 15.57% | +22.14% |