PALL vs. BCD
Compare and contrast key facts about Aberdeen Standard Physical Palladium Shares ETF (PALL) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCD).
PALL and BCD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PALL is a passively managed fund by Aberdeen that tracks the performance of the Palladium London PM Fix ($/ozt). It was launched on Jan 6, 2010. BCD is an actively managed fund by Aberdeen. It was launched on Mar 30, 2017.
Performance
PALL vs. BCD - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PALL vs. BCD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PALL Aberdeen Standard Physical Palladium Shares ETF | -7.34% | 74.07% | -17.38% | -38.77% | -6.28% | -23.26% | 25.27% | 53.94% | 17.23% | 32.87% |
BCD abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF | 15.57% | 15.71% | 6.20% | -7.58% | 18.38% | 31.87% | 4.76% | 7.34% | -8.65% | 3.08% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PALL achieves a -7.34% return, which is significantly lower than BCD's 15.57% return.
PALL
- 1D
- 5.15%
- 1M
- -17.05%
- YTD
- -7.34%
- 6M
- 17.99%
- 1Y
- 48.77%
- 3Y*
- -0.08%
- 5Y*
- -11.63%
- 10Y*
- 9.50%
BCD
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- 4.50%
- YTD
- 15.57%
- 6M
- 21.94%
- 1Y
- 22.76%
- 3Y*
- 11.07%
- 5Y*
- 13.81%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PALL vs. BCD - Expense Ratio Comparison
PALL has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than BCD's 0.29% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PALL vs. BCD — Risk / Return Rank
PALL
BCD
PALL vs. BCD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aberdeen Standard Physical Palladium Shares ETF (PALL) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PALL | BCD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.01 | 1.51 | -0.50 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.48 | 2.02 | -0.54 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.29 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.51 | 2.42 | -0.91 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.55 | 7.58 | -3.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PALL | BCD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.01 | 1.51 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.28 | 0.90 | -1.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 0.65 | -0.44 |
Correlation
The correlation between PALL and BCD is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
PALL vs. BCD - Dividend Comparison
PALL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BCD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.89%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PALL Aberdeen Standard Physical Palladium Shares ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BCD abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF | 14.89% | 17.21% | 3.60% | 4.51% | 5.21% | 8.30% | 1.29% | 1.55% | 1.59% | 0.07% |
Drawdowns
PALL vs. BCD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PALL drawdown since its inception was -73.63%, which is greater than BCD's maximum drawdown of -29.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PALL and BCD.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PALL | BCD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.63% | -29.81% | -43.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.17% | -9.75% | -24.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -73.63% | -23.03% | -50.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -54.34% | -2.53% | -51.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.51% | -10.01% | -16.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.31% | 3.11% | +8.20% |
Volatility
PALL vs. BCD - Volatility Comparison
Aberdeen Standard Physical Palladium Shares ETF (PALL) has a higher volatility of 15.73% compared to abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCD) at 5.53%. This indicates that PALL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BCD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PALL | BCD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.73% | 5.53% | +10.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.92% | 11.60% | +32.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.74% | 15.15% | +33.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.07% | 15.42% | +26.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.71% | 13.93% | +23.78% |