PALC vs. DLN
PALC (Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF) and DLN (WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - PALC tracks the Lunt Capital U.S. Large Cap Multi-Factor Rotation Index while DLN tracks the WisdomTree LargeCap Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PALC returned 9.40%/yr vs 12.22%/yr for DLN. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PALC charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for DLN.
Performance
PALC vs. DLN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PALC achieves a 11.39% return, which is significantly higher than DLN's 9.93% return.
PALC
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 6.95%
- YTD
- 11.39%
- 6M
- 12.77%
- 1Y
- 21.51%
- 3Y*
- 17.82%
- 5Y*
- 9.40%
- 10Y*
- —
DLN
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 2.93%
- YTD
- 9.93%
- 6M
- 9.96%
- 1Y
- 22.38%
- 3Y*
- 18.35%
- 5Y*
- 12.22%
- 10Y*
- 12.68%
PALC vs. DLN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PALC Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF | 11.39% | 7.28% | 21.24% | 17.52% | -14.74% | 41.03% | 22.18% |
DLN WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF | 9.93% | 15.53% | 19.66% | 9.95% | -3.78% | 25.60% | 18.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between PALC and DLN is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2020 | 0.80 |
The correlation between PALC and DLN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
PALC vs. DLN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PALC
DLN
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
PALC
DLN
Technology
PALC
DLN
Industrials
PALC
DLN
Healthcare
PALC
DLN
Energy
PALC
DLN
Consumer Defensive
PALC
DLN
Communication Services
PALC
DLN
Consumer Cyclical
PALC
DLN
Basic Materials
PALC
DLN
Utilities
PALC
DLN
Real Estate
PALC
DLN
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PALC vs. DLN — Risk / Return Rank
PALC
DLN
PALC vs. DLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PALC) and WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF (DLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PALC | DLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.46 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.42 | 3.69 | -1.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.98 | 15.59 | -6.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PALC | DLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.87 | 2.53 | -0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | 0.93 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.98 | 0.53 | +0.45 |
Drawdowns
PALC vs. DLN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PALC drawdown since its inception was -24.45%, smaller than the maximum DLN drawdown of -57.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PALC and DLN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PALC | DLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.45% | -57.84% | +33.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.94% | -6.10% | -2.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.39% | -13.71% | -3.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.45% | -16.26% | -8.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.82% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.38% | -0.51% | +0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.33% | -7.52% | +1.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.40% | 1.44% | +0.96% |
Volatility
PALC vs. DLN - Volatility Comparison
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PALC) has a higher volatility of 2.95% compared to WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF (DLN) at 2.17%. This indicates that PALC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PALC | DLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.95% | 2.17% | +0.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.55% | 6.77% | +1.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.58% | 8.87% | +2.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.22% | 13.26% | +2.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.07% | 16.16% | +0.91% |
PALC vs. DLN - Expense Ratio Comparison
PALC has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than DLN's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
PALC vs. DLN - Dividend Comparison
PALC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, less than DLN's 1.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DLN WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF | 1.79% | 1.90% | 2.00% | 2.43% | 2.53% | 2.01% | 2.66% | 2.51% | 2.90% | 2.33% | 2.64% | 2.80% |
PALC Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF | 1.04% | 1.08% | 0.93% | 0.74% | 1.69% | 0.64% | 0.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PALC and DLN have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PALC has higher volatility (2.95%) compared to DLN (2.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PALC dropped -24.45% vs DLN's -57.84%.
On 5-year performance, DLN leads with 12.22% vs 9.40% for PALC. On fees, DLN is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, DLN has been the lower-risk option at 2.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DLN has performed better with a 12.22% return vs 9.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DLN is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PALC.
DLN has the higher dividend yield at 1.79%, compared with 1.04% for PALC.
PALC tracks Lunt Capital U.S. Large Cap Multi-Factor Rotation Index, while DLN tracks WisdomTree LargeCap Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PALC and 0.28% for DLN.
DLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PALC and DLN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer