PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAEAX vs. PNOPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PAEAX vs. PNOPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Growth Fund (PAEAX) and Putnam Sustainable Leaders Fund (PNOPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAEAX achieves a 9.80% return, which is significantly higher than PNOPX's 4.12% return. Over the past 10 years, PAEAX has underperformed PNOPX with an annualized return of 11.15%, while PNOPX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.00% annualized return.


PAEAX

1D
-0.55%
1M
3.23%
YTD
9.80%
6M
10.69%
1Y
24.12%
3Y*
19.64%
5Y*
10.24%
10Y*
11.15%

PNOPX

1D
-0.66%
1M
3.35%
YTD
4.12%
6M
3.63%
1Y
18.38%
3Y*
17.22%
5Y*
9.03%
10Y*
15.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAEAX vs. PNOPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PAEAX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Growth Fund
9.80%18.45%18.71%20.78%-16.99%16.63%14.41%20.79%-9.73%19.92%
PNOPX
Putnam Sustainable Leaders Fund
4.12%10.93%22.97%26.23%-22.86%23.44%28.57%35.86%-0.90%29.07%

Correlation

The correlation between PAEAX and PNOPX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 1994

0.90

The correlation between PAEAX and PNOPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PAEAX vs. PNOPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAEAX
PAEAX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
PAEAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAEAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAEAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
PAEAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAEAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

PNOPX
PNOPX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
PNOPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PNOPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
PNOPX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
PNOPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
PNOPX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAEAX vs. PNOPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Growth Fund (PAEAX) and Putnam Sustainable Leaders Fund (PNOPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PAEAXPNOPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.28

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.23

1.43

+1.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.68

5.36

+9.32

PAEAX vs. PNOPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAEAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is higher than the PNOPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAEAX and PNOPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PAEAXPNOPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.38

1.52

+0.86

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

0.52

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

0.83

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.55

+0.01

Drawdowns

PAEAX vs. PNOPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAEAX drawdown since its inception was -53.25%, smaller than the maximum PNOPX drawdown of -74.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAEAX and PNOPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PAEAXPNOPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.25%

-74.15%

+20.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.59%

-13.06%

+5.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.31%

-22.90%

+1.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.30%

-29.13%

+5.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.57%

-30.29%

+1.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.55%

-0.66%

+0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.66%

-24.03%

+16.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.67%

3.48%

-1.81%

Volatility

PAEAX vs. PNOPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Growth Fund (PAEAX) is 2.89%, while Putnam Sustainable Leaders Fund (PNOPX) has a volatility of 3.32%. This indicates that PAEAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PNOPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PAEAXPNOPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.89%

3.32%

-0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.11%

9.46%

-1.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.31%

12.30%

-1.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.39%

17.36%

-1.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.99%

18.15%

-3.16%

PAEAX vs. PNOPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAEAX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than PNOPX's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

PAEAX vs. PNOPX - Dividend Comparison

PAEAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.22%, less than PNOPX's 10.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PAEAX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Growth Fund
6.22%6.83%11.00%4.18%1.73%14.90%0.47%1.56%10.41%10.22%1.58%6.53%
PNOPX
Putnam Sustainable Leaders Fund
10.77%11.22%9.25%2.96%8.38%11.69%7.41%7.14%20.24%4.91%0.00%12.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, PAEAX and PNOPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PNOPX has higher volatility (3.32%) compared to PAEAX (2.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAEAX dropped -53.25% vs PNOPX's -74.15%.

PAEAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PAEAX and PNOPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer