PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAEAX vs. PSDYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PAEAX vs. PSDYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Growth Fund (PAEAX) and Putnam Ultra Short Duration Income Fund (PSDYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAEAX achieves a 10.40% return, which is significantly higher than PSDYX's 1.43% return. Over the past 10 years, PAEAX has outperformed PSDYX with an annualized return of 11.21%, while PSDYX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.53% annualized return.


PAEAX

1D
0.38%
1M
4.62%
YTD
10.40%
6M
11.34%
1Y
25.11%
3Y*
19.86%
5Y*
10.53%
10Y*
11.21%

PSDYX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.35%
YTD
1.43%
6M
1.82%
1Y
4.39%
3Y*
4.87%
5Y*
3.37%
10Y*
2.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAEAX vs. PSDYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PAEAX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Growth Fund
10.40%18.45%18.71%20.78%-16.99%16.63%14.41%20.79%-9.73%19.92%
PSDYX
Putnam Ultra Short Duration Income Fund
1.43%4.99%5.25%4.78%0.61%0.07%1.50%2.86%1.95%1.40%

Correlation

The correlation between PAEAX and PSDYX is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2012

0.02

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PAEAX vs. PSDYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAEAX
PAEAX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
PAEAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAEAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAEAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
PAEAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAEAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

PSDYX
PSDYX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
PSDYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSDYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSDYX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
PSDYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSDYX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAEAX vs. PSDYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Growth Fund (PAEAX) and Putnam Ultra Short Duration Income Fund (PSDYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PAEAXPSDYXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.48

3.18

-0.70

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.47

10.05

-6.59

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

3.30

-1.85

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.36

8.96

-5.60

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.28

44.19

-28.91

PAEAX vs. PSDYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAEAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is comparable to the PSDYX Sharpe Ratio of 3.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAEAX and PSDYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PAEAXPSDYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.48

3.18

-0.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

2.61

-1.92

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

2.41

-1.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

2.19

-1.63

Drawdowns

PAEAX vs. PSDYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAEAX drawdown since its inception was -53.25%, which is greater than PSDYX's maximum drawdown of -2.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAEAX and PSDYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PAEAXPSDYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.25%

-2.58%

-50.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.59%

-0.49%

-7.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.31%

-0.49%

-20.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.30%

-0.80%

-22.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.57%

-2.58%

-25.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.67%

-0.07%

-7.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.67%

0.10%

+1.57%

Volatility

PAEAX vs. PSDYX - Volatility Comparison

Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Growth Fund (PAEAX) has a higher volatility of 2.86% compared to Putnam Ultra Short Duration Income Fund (PSDYX) at 0.38%. This indicates that PAEAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSDYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PAEAXPSDYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.86%

0.38%

+2.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.10%

0.93%

+7.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.30%

1.39%

+8.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.38%

1.30%

+14.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.99%

1.06%

+13.93%

PAEAX vs. PSDYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAEAX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than PSDYX's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

PAEAX vs. PSDYX - Dividend Comparison

PAEAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.18%, more than PSDYX's 4.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PAEAX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Growth Fund
6.18%6.83%11.00%4.18%1.73%14.90%0.47%1.56%10.41%10.22%1.58%6.53%
PSDYX
Putnam Ultra Short Duration Income Fund
4.40%4.65%4.81%3.65%1.30%0.37%1.09%2.51%2.23%1.29%0.88%0.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


PAEAX and PSDYX have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PAEAX has higher volatility (2.86%) compared to PSDYX (0.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAEAX dropped -53.25% vs PSDYX's -2.58%.

PSDYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.18 vs 2.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PAEAX and PSDYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer