PACIX vs. LOCFX
PACIX (Columbia Convertible Securities Fund) and LOCFX (Lord Abbett Convertible Fund Class F3) are both Convertible Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, PACIX returned 7.67%/yr vs 6.92%/yr for LOCFX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PACIX charges 1.12%/yr vs 0.82%/yr for LOCFX.
Performance
PACIX vs. LOCFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PACIX achieves a 24.56% return, which is significantly higher than LOCFX's 21.35% return.
PACIX
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 4.89%
- YTD
- 24.56%
- 6M
- 22.69%
- 1Y
- 42.41%
- 3Y*
- 19.72%
- 5Y*
- 7.67%
- 10Y*
- 13.74%
LOCFX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 2.36%
- YTD
- 21.35%
- 6M
- 19.62%
- 1Y
- 37.80%
- 3Y*
- 20.91%
- 5Y*
- 6.92%
- 10Y*
- —
PACIX vs. LOCFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PACIX Columbia Convertible Securities Fund | 24.56% | 19.58% | 9.51% | 11.91% | -19.54% | 3.71% | 47.86% | 26.15% | -1.03% | 10.00% |
LOCFX Lord Abbett Convertible Fund Class F3 | 21.35% | 22.43% | 14.00% | 7.30% | -23.12% | 1.40% | 64.47% | 25.07% | -6.42% | 10.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between PACIX and LOCFX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2017 | 0.90 |
The correlation between PACIX and LOCFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PACIX vs. LOCFX — Risk / Return Rank
PACIX
LOCFX
PACIX vs. LOCFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Convertible Securities Fund (PACIX) and Lord Abbett Convertible Fund Class F3 (LOCFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PACIX | LOCFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.43 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.49 | 5.50 | -0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.93 | 19.15 | +1.77 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PACIX vs. LOCFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PACIX drawdown since its inception was -43.86%, which is greater than LOCFX's maximum drawdown of -33.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PACIX and LOCFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PACIX | LOCFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.86% | -33.29% | -10.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.85% | -7.02% | -0.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.15% | -12.09% | -0.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.71% | -30.60% | +3.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.74% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.16% | -0.90% | +0.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.83% | -11.16% | +4.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.05% | 2.01% | +0.04% |
Volatility
PACIX vs. LOCFX - Volatility Comparison
Columbia Convertible Securities Fund (PACIX) and Lord Abbett Convertible Fund Class F3 (LOCFX) have volatilities of 6.10% and 6.03%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PACIX | LOCFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.10% | 6.03% | +0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.53% | 13.00% | -0.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.29% | 15.66% | -0.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.27% | 13.17% | +0.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.50% | 14.08% | -0.58% |
PACIX vs. LOCFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PACIX has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is higher than LOCFX's 0.82% expense ratio.
Dividends
PACIX vs. LOCFX - Dividend Comparison
PACIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.97%, more than LOCFX's 1.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LOCFX Lord Abbett Convertible Fund Class F3 | 1.27% | 1.86% | 2.29% | 2.06% | 2.72% | 18.36% | 16.20% | 8.75% | 5.02% | 2.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PACIX Columbia Convertible Securities Fund | 3.97% | 1.45% | 1.96% | 2.53% | 9.87% | 22.27% | 7.81% | 6.29% | 5.29% | 2.75% | 2.34% | 9.91% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, PACIX and LOCFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
PACIX has higher volatility (6.10%) compared to LOCFX (6.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PACIX dropped -43.86% vs LOCFX's -33.29%.
PACIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.82 vs 2.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PACIX and LOCFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer