PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PACIX vs. ANNPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PACIX vs. ANNPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Convertible Securities Fund (PACIX) and Virtus Convertible Fund (ANNPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PACIX achieves a 16.64% return, which is significantly higher than ANNPX's 13.93% return. Over the past 10 years, PACIX has underperformed ANNPX with an annualized return of 12.30%, while ANNPX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.40% annualized return.


PACIX

1D
2.45%
1M
-3.45%
6M
10.26%
YTD
16.64%
1Y
28.55%
3Y*
15.41%
5Y*
6.44%
10Y*
12.30%
ALL TIME*
9.39%

ANNPX

1D
2.60%
1M
-2.60%
6M
9.03%
YTD
13.93%
1Y
29.08%
3Y*
16.92%
5Y*
7.14%
10Y*
13.40%
ALL TIME*
7.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

PACIX vs. ANNPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PACIX
Columbia Convertible Securities Fund
16.64%19.58%9.51%11.91%-19.54%3.71%47.86%26.15%-1.03%15.07%
ANNPX
Virtus Convertible Fund
13.93%22.50%14.13%8.39%-18.65%4.96%55.99%26.45%2.76%15.22%

Correlation

The correlation between PACIX and ANNPX is 0.97 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 1993

0.92

The correlation between PACIX and ANNPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PACIX vs. ANNPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PACIX
PACIX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
PACIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PACIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
PACIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
PACIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
PACIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

ANNPX
ANNPX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
ANNPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANNPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANNPX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
ANNPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANNPX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PACIX vs. ANNPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Convertible Securities Fund (PACIX) and Virtus Convertible Fund (ANNPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PACIXANNPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.30

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.08

3.05

+0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.65

11.64

-0.99

PACIX vs. ANNPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PACIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is comparable to the ANNPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PACIX and ANNPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PACIX vs. ANNPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PACIX drawdown since its inception was -43.86%, smaller than the maximum ANNPX drawdown of -55.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PACIX and ANNPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PACIXANNPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.86%

-55.61%

+11.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.75%

-9.06%

+0.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.15%

-13.67%

+1.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.71%

-26.85%

+0.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.74%

-27.36%

-1.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.52%

-6.70%

+0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.82%

-17.38%

+10.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.52%

2.37%

+0.15%

Volatility

PACIX vs. ANNPX - Volatility Comparison

Columbia Convertible Securities Fund (PACIX) and Virtus Convertible Fund (ANNPX) have volatilities of 5.08% and 5.32%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PACIXANNPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.08%

5.32%

-0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.21%

12.96%

+0.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.17%

15.75%

+0.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.43%

13.19%

+0.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.56%

13.73%

-0.17%

PACIX vs. ANNPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PACIX has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is higher than ANNPX's 0.71% expense ratio.


Dividends

PACIX vs. ANNPX - Dividend Comparison

PACIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.24%, less than ANNPX's 9.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ANNPX
Virtus Convertible Fund
9.68%11.32%2.31%2.56%1.55%20.74%6.94%5.12%18.79%23.47%2.88%10.63%
PACIX
Columbia Convertible Securities Fund
4.24%1.45%1.96%2.53%9.87%22.27%7.81%6.29%5.29%2.75%2.34%9.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, PACIX and ANNPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ANNPX has higher volatility (5.32%) compared to PACIX (5.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PACIX dropped -43.86% vs ANNPX's -55.61%.

ANNPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PACIX and ANNPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer