PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LOCFX vs. PCONX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LOCFX vs. PCONX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Convertible Fund Class F3 (LOCFX) and Putnam Convertible Securities Fund (PCONX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LOCFX achieves a 21.35% return, which is significantly lower than PCONX's 23.04% return.


LOCFX

1D
0.00%
1M
2.36%
YTD
21.35%
6M
19.62%
1Y
37.80%
3Y*
20.91%
5Y*
6.92%
10Y*

PCONX

1D
-0.27%
1M
3.90%
YTD
23.04%
6M
21.29%
1Y
32.74%
3Y*
17.53%
5Y*
6.59%
10Y*
12.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LOCFX vs. PCONX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LOCFX
Lord Abbett Convertible Fund Class F3
21.35%22.43%14.00%7.30%-23.12%1.40%64.47%25.07%-6.42%10.04%
PCONX
Putnam Convertible Securities Fund
23.04%11.97%12.60%10.13%-19.27%4.23%44.86%24.32%-2.92%9.02%

Correlation

The correlation between LOCFX and PCONX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2017

0.91

The correlation between LOCFX and PCONX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LOCFX vs. PCONX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LOCFX
LOCFX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
LOCFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LOCFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
LOCFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
LOCFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
LOCFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

PCONX
PCONX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
PCONX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PCONX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
PCONX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
PCONX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
PCONX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LOCFX vs. PCONX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Convertible Fund Class F3 (LOCFX) and Putnam Convertible Securities Fund (PCONX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LOCFXPCONXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.39

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.50

4.54

+0.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.15

15.14

+4.01

LOCFX vs. PCONX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LOCFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is comparable to the PCONX Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LOCFX and PCONX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LOCFX vs. PCONX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LOCFX drawdown since its inception was -33.29%, smaller than the maximum PCONX drawdown of -47.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOCFX and PCONX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LOCFXPCONXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.29%

-47.70%

+14.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.02%

-7.35%

+0.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.09%

-13.41%

+1.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.60%

-25.48%

-5.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.90%

-0.69%

-0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.16%

-8.29%

-2.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

2.20%

-0.19%

Volatility

LOCFX vs. PCONX - Volatility Comparison

Lord Abbett Convertible Fund Class F3 (LOCFX) and Putnam Convertible Securities Fund (PCONX) have volatilities of 6.03% and 6.27%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LOCFXPCONXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.03%

6.27%

-0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.00%

12.80%

+0.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.66%

15.18%

+0.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.17%

12.85%

+0.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.08%

13.14%

+0.94%

LOCFX vs. PCONX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LOCFX has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is lower than PCONX's 1.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

LOCFX vs. PCONX - Dividend Comparison

LOCFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, less than PCONX's 4.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LOCFX
Lord Abbett Convertible Fund Class F3
1.27%1.86%2.29%2.06%2.72%18.36%16.20%8.75%5.02%2.08%0.00%0.00%
PCONX
Putnam Convertible Securities Fund
4.46%6.10%1.48%0.99%0.72%26.98%11.62%7.72%13.92%3.48%2.08%6.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, LOCFX and PCONX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PCONX has higher volatility (6.27%) compared to LOCFX (6.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LOCFX dropped -33.29% vs PCONX's -47.70%.

LOCFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LOCFX and PCONX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer