PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PACIX vs. PCONX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PACIX vs. PCONX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Convertible Securities Fund (PACIX) and Putnam Convertible Securities Fund (PCONX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with PACIX having a 22.48% return and PCONX slightly lower at 22.30%. Over the past 10 years, PACIX has outperformed PCONX with an annualized return of 13.32%, while PCONX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.83% annualized return.


PACIX

1D
0.90%
1M
7.17%
YTD
22.48%
6M
23.14%
1Y
43.63%
3Y*
19.78%
5Y*
7.72%
10Y*
13.32%

PCONX

1D
1.25%
1M
6.36%
YTD
22.30%
6M
22.84%
1Y
33.61%
3Y*
17.64%
5Y*
6.98%
10Y*
11.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PACIX vs. PCONX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PACIX
Columbia Convertible Securities Fund
22.48%19.58%9.51%11.91%-19.54%3.71%47.86%26.15%-1.03%15.07%
PCONX
Putnam Convertible Securities Fund
22.30%11.97%12.60%10.13%-19.27%4.23%44.86%24.32%-2.92%14.41%

Correlation

The correlation between PACIX and PCONX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 1987

0.91

The correlation between PACIX and PCONX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PACIX vs. PCONX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PACIX
PACIX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
PACIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PACIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
PACIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
PACIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
PACIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

PCONX
PCONX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
PCONX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PCONX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
PCONX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
PCONX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
PCONX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PACIX vs. PCONX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Convertible Securities Fund (PACIX) and Putnam Convertible Securities Fund (PCONX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PACIXPCONXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.10

2.42

+0.68

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.99

3.23

+0.77

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.43

+0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.59

4.65

+0.94

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

22.38

16.40

+5.98

PACIX vs. PCONX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PACIX Sharpe Ratio is 3.10, which is comparable to the PCONX Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PACIX and PCONX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PACIXPCONXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.10

2.42

+0.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.56

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.00

0.91

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

0.68

+0.17

Drawdowns

PACIX vs. PCONX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PACIX drawdown since its inception was -43.86%, smaller than the maximum PCONX drawdown of -47.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PACIX and PCONX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PACIXPCONXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.86%

-47.70%

+3.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.85%

-7.35%

-0.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.15%

-13.41%

+1.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.71%

-25.48%

-1.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.74%

-26.14%

-2.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.83%

-8.29%

+1.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.96%

2.08%

-0.12%

Volatility

PACIX vs. PCONX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Columbia Convertible Securities Fund (PACIX) is 4.60%, while Putnam Convertible Securities Fund (PCONX) has a volatility of 5.19%. This indicates that PACIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PCONX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PACIXPCONXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.60%

5.19%

-0.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.63%

11.79%

-0.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.32%

14.15%

+0.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.06%

12.63%

+0.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.40%

13.02%

+0.38%

PACIX vs. PCONX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PACIX has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is higher than PCONX's 1.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

PACIX vs. PCONX - Dividend Comparison

PACIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, less than PCONX's 4.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PACIX
Columbia Convertible Securities Fund
1.21%1.45%1.96%2.53%9.87%22.27%7.81%6.29%5.29%2.75%2.34%9.91%
PCONX
Putnam Convertible Securities Fund
4.49%6.10%1.48%0.99%0.72%26.98%11.62%7.72%13.92%3.48%2.08%6.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, PACIX and PCONX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PCONX has higher volatility (5.19%) compared to PACIX (4.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PACIX dropped -43.86% vs PCONX's -47.70%.

PACIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.10 vs 2.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PACIX and PCONX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer