PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAC.DE vs. BATF.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PAC.DE vs. BATF.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Pacific ex Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF (PAC.DE) and L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan ESG Exclusions Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Accumulating ETF (BATF.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAC.DE achieves a 8.00% return, which is significantly higher than BATF.DE's 2.86% return.


PAC.DE

1D
-0.85%
1M
-0.06%
YTD
8.00%
6M
9.57%
1Y
12.71%
3Y*
9.63%
5Y*
5.97%
10Y*

BATF.DE

1D
-0.35%
1M
-3.04%
YTD
2.86%
6M
3.58%
1Y
7.37%
3Y*
7.05%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAC.DE vs. BATF.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PAC.DE and BATF.DE is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2022

0.93

The correlation between PAC.DE and BATF.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PAC.DE vs. BATF.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAC.DE
PAC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
PAC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
PAC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

BATF.DE
BATF.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
BATF.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BATF.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
BATF.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
BATF.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
BATF.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAC.DE vs. BATF.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Pacific ex Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF (PAC.DE) and L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan ESG Exclusions Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Accumulating ETF (BATF.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PAC.DEBATF.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.11

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.00

1.13

+0.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.65

2.74

+2.90

PAC.DE vs. BATF.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAC.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is higher than the BATF.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAC.DE and BATF.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PAC.DEBATF.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.08

0.61

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.51

-0.08

Drawdowns

PAC.DE vs. BATF.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAC.DE drawdown since its inception was -36.90%, which is greater than BATF.DE's maximum drawdown of -18.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAC.DE and BATF.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PAC.DEBATF.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.90%

-18.62%

-18.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.33%

-6.47%

+0.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.21%

-18.62%

-1.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.33%

-5.63%

+3.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.10%

-5.59%

+0.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.25%

2.68%

-0.43%

Volatility

PAC.DE vs. BATF.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Pacific ex Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF (PAC.DE) is 3.19%, while L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan ESG Exclusions Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Accumulating ETF (BATF.DE) has a volatility of 3.62%. This indicates that PAC.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BATF.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PAC.DEBATF.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.19%

3.62%

-0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.91%

8.97%

-0.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.77%

12.09%

-0.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.54%

14.45%

+0.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.52%

14.45%

+2.07%

PAC.DE vs. BATF.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PAC.DE and BATF.DE have an expense ratio of 0.16%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PAC.DE vs. BATF.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither PAC.DE nor BATF.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


PAC.DE and BATF.DE have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.16% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PAC.DE and BATF.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.16% per year.

PAC.DE tracks MSCI Pacific ex Japan ESG Filtered Min TE, while BATF.DE tracks Foxberry Sustainability Consensus Pacific ex Japan. They also come from different issuers: BNP Paribas and LGIM Managers (Europe) Limited.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PAC.DE and BATF.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer