PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAC.DE vs. DBX8.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PAC.DE vs. DBX8.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Pacific ex Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF (PAC.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Korea UCITS ETF 1C (DBX8.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PAC.DE vs. DBX8.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PAC.DE
BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Pacific ex Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF
5.95%6.73%12.07%2.38%0.50%12.85%-2.66%21.45%-6.04%10.46%
DBX8.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Korea UCITS ETF 1C
28.25%77.39%-18.45%15.93%-23.95%-0.54%30.13%14.92%-18.04%28.39%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAC.DE achieves a 5.95% return, which is significantly lower than DBX8.DE's 28.25% return.


PAC.DE

1D
-0.10%
1M
-1.34%
YTD
5.95%
6M
5.98%
1Y
15.79%
3Y*
8.52%
5Y*
6.18%
10Y*

DBX8.DE

1D
-3.73%
1M
-5.48%
YTD
28.25%
6M
54.87%
1Y
120.27%
3Y*
27.16%
5Y*
8.37%
10Y*
11.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PAC.DE vs. DBX8.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAC.DE has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than DBX8.DE's 0.45% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

PAC.DE vs. DBX8.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAC.DE
PAC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
PAC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
PAC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

DBX8.DE
DBX8.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
DBX8.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBX8.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBX8.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
DBX8.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBX8.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAC.DE vs. DBX8.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Pacific ex Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF (PAC.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Korea UCITS ETF 1C (DBX8.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PAC.DEDBX8.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.98

3.04

-2.06

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.35

3.66

-2.30

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.54

-0.33

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.10

6.07

-2.98

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.24

19.21

-9.97

PAC.DE vs. DBX8.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAC.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is lower than the DBX8.DE Sharpe Ratio of 3.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAC.DE and DBX8.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PAC.DEDBX8.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

3.04

-2.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.33

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.21

+0.21

Correlation

The correlation between PAC.DE and DBX8.DE is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

PAC.DE vs. DBX8.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither PAC.DE nor DBX8.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

PAC.DE vs. DBX8.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAC.DE drawdown since its inception was -36.90%, smaller than the maximum DBX8.DE drawdown of -68.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAC.DE and DBX8.DE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PAC.DEDBX8.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.90%

-68.01%

+31.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.86%

-21.19%

+10.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.21%

-41.52%

+21.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.93%

-16.90%

+12.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.16%

-17.68%

+12.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.12%

6.70%

-4.58%

Volatility

PAC.DE vs. DBX8.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Pacific ex Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF (PAC.DE) is 4.70%, while Xtrackers MSCI Korea UCITS ETF 1C (DBX8.DE) has a volatility of 17.06%. This indicates that PAC.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBX8.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PAC.DEDBX8.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.70%

17.06%

-12.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.87%

35.26%

-26.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.03%

39.32%

-23.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.53%

25.69%

-11.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.56%

25.06%

-8.50%