PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BATF.DE vs. OP6E.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BATF.DE vs. OP6E.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan ESG Exclusions Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Accumulating ETF (BATF.DE) and Ossiam Bloomberg Asia Pacific ex Japan PAB NR UCITS ETF (EUR) (OP6E.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BATF.DE vs. OP6E.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with BATF.DE having a 4.14% return and OP6E.DE slightly higher at 4.16%.


BATF.DE

1D
0.49%
1M
-1.67%
YTD
4.14%
6M
2.57%
1Y
14.75%
3Y*
6.99%
5Y*
10Y*

OP6E.DE

1D
0.20%
1M
-1.88%
YTD
4.16%
6M
3.13%
1Y
12.95%
3Y*
8.15%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BATF.DE vs. OP6E.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

BATF.DE has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than OP6E.DE's 0.29% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BATF.DE vs. OP6E.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BATF.DE
BATF.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
BATF.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BATF.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
BATF.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
BATF.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
BATF.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

OP6E.DE
OP6E.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
OP6E.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OP6E.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
OP6E.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
OP6E.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
OP6E.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BATF.DE vs. OP6E.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan ESG Exclusions Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Accumulating ETF (BATF.DE) and Ossiam Bloomberg Asia Pacific ex Japan PAB NR UCITS ETF (EUR) (OP6E.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BATF.DEOP6E.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.94

0.85

+0.09

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.31

1.18

+0.13

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.18

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.84

2.43

+0.41

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.31

7.50

+0.81

BATF.DE vs. OP6E.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BATF.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is comparable to the OP6E.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BATF.DE and OP6E.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BATF.DEOP6E.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

0.85

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.37

+0.20

Correlation

The correlation between BATF.DE and OP6E.DE is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

BATF.DE vs. OP6E.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither BATF.DE nor OP6E.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

BATF.DE vs. OP6E.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BATF.DE drawdown since its inception was -18.62%, roughly equal to the maximum OP6E.DE drawdown of -18.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BATF.DE and OP6E.DE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BATF.DEOP6E.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.62%

-18.34%

-0.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.42%

-10.46%

+1.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.46%

-4.73%

+0.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.69%

-4.93%

-0.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.21%

2.18%

+0.03%

Volatility

BATF.DE vs. OP6E.DE - Volatility Comparison

L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan ESG Exclusions Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Accumulating ETF (BATF.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.56% compared to Ossiam Bloomberg Asia Pacific ex Japan PAB NR UCITS ETF (EUR) (OP6E.DE) at 4.32%. This indicates that BATF.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OP6E.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BATF.DEOP6E.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.56%

4.32%

+0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.76%

8.56%

+0.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.66%

15.25%

+0.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.43%

14.81%

-0.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.43%

14.81%

-0.38%