BATF.DE vs. FLXT.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan ESG Exclusions Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Accumulating ETF (BATF.DE) and Franklin FTSE Taiwan UCITS ETF USD Capitalisation (FLXT.DE).
BATF.DE and FLXT.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BATF.DE is a passively managed fund by LGIM Managers (Europe) Limited that tracks the performance of the Foxberry Sustainability Consensus Pacific ex Japan. It was launched on Oct 20, 2022. FLXT.DE is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the FTSE Taiwan 30/18 Capped. It was launched on Mar 21, 2022. Both BATF.DE and FLXT.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
BATF.DE vs. FLXT.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BATF.DE vs. FLXT.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BATF.DE L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan ESG Exclusions Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Accumulating ETF | 3.63% | 8.25% | 10.50% | -0.71% | 6.02% |
FLXT.DE Franklin FTSE Taiwan UCITS ETF USD Capitalisation | 15.53% | 19.89% | 30.42% | 25.56% | 8.00% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BATF.DE achieves a 3.63% return, which is significantly lower than FLXT.DE's 15.53% return.
BATF.DE
- 1D
- 1.66%
- 1M
- -4.02%
- YTD
- 3.63%
- 6M
- 2.64%
- 1Y
- 14.12%
- 3Y*
- 7.01%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLXT.DE
- 1D
- 3.86%
- 1M
- -4.08%
- YTD
- 15.53%
- 6M
- 22.96%
- 1Y
- 56.38%
- 3Y*
- 26.47%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BATF.DE vs. FLXT.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
BATF.DE has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than FLXT.DE's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
BATF.DE vs. FLXT.DE — Risk / Return Rank
BATF.DE
FLXT.DE
BATF.DE vs. FLXT.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan ESG Exclusions Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Accumulating ETF (BATF.DE) and Franklin FTSE Taiwan UCITS ETF USD Capitalisation (FLXT.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BATF.DE | FLXT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.90 | 2.08 | -1.18 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.26 | 2.66 | -1.40 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.38 | -0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.51 | 3.81 | -2.31 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.66 | 16.39 | -10.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BATF.DE | FLXT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 | 2.08 | -1.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.70 | -0.15 |
Correlation
The correlation between BATF.DE and FLXT.DE is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
BATF.DE vs. FLXT.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither BATF.DE nor FLXT.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
BATF.DE vs. FLXT.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BATF.DE drawdown since its inception was -18.62%, smaller than the maximum FLXT.DE drawdown of -31.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BATF.DE and FLXT.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BATF.DE | FLXT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.62% | -31.16% | +12.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.20% | -19.48% | +7.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.92% | -5.54% | +0.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.70% | -8.48% | +2.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.51% | 3.39% | -0.88% |
Volatility
BATF.DE vs. FLXT.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan ESG Exclusions Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Accumulating ETF (BATF.DE) is 4.62%, while Franklin FTSE Taiwan UCITS ETF USD Capitalisation (FLXT.DE) has a volatility of 7.91%. This indicates that BATF.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLXT.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BATF.DE | FLXT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.62% | 7.91% | -3.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.78% | 16.57% | -7.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.75% | 27.07% | -11.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.44% | 21.28% | -6.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.44% | 21.28% | -6.84% |