PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAC.DE vs. APXJ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PAC.DE vs. APXJ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Pacific ex Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF (PAC.DE) and Amundi Index MSCI Pacific ex Japan SRI PAB UCITS ETF EUR Dist (APXJ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PAC.DE vs. APXJ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
PAC.DE
BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Pacific ex Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF
5.95%6.73%12.07%2.38%1.97%
APXJ.DE
Amundi Index MSCI Pacific ex Japan SRI PAB UCITS ETF EUR Dist
3.23%0.37%5.75%1.28%-6.27%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAC.DE achieves a 5.95% return, which is significantly higher than APXJ.DE's 3.23% return.


PAC.DE

1D
-0.10%
1M
-1.34%
YTD
5.95%
6M
5.98%
1Y
15.79%
3Y*
8.52%
5Y*
6.18%
10Y*

APXJ.DE

1D
-0.21%
1M
-1.58%
YTD
3.23%
6M
1.82%
1Y
6.43%
3Y*
2.85%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PAC.DE vs. APXJ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAC.DE has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than APXJ.DE's 0.45% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

PAC.DE vs. APXJ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAC.DE
PAC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
PAC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
PAC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

APXJ.DE
APXJ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
APXJ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APXJ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
APXJ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
APXJ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
APXJ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAC.DE vs. APXJ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Pacific ex Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF (PAC.DE) and Amundi Index MSCI Pacific ex Japan SRI PAB UCITS ETF EUR Dist (APXJ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PAC.DEAPXJ.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.98

0.43

+0.55

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.35

0.67

+0.68

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.10

+0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.10

1.39

+1.71

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.24

3.65

+5.59

PAC.DE vs. APXJ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAC.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is higher than the APXJ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAC.DE and APXJ.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PAC.DEAPXJ.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

0.43

+0.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.07

+0.36

Correlation

The correlation between PAC.DE and APXJ.DE is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

PAC.DE vs. APXJ.DE - Dividend Comparison

PAC.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while APXJ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.78%.


Drawdowns

PAC.DE vs. APXJ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAC.DE drawdown since its inception was -36.90%, which is greater than APXJ.DE's maximum drawdown of -22.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAC.DE and APXJ.DE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PAC.DEAPXJ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.90%

-22.00%

-14.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.86%

-9.23%

-1.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.93%

-4.13%

+0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.16%

-9.64%

+4.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.12%

2.34%

-0.22%

Volatility

PAC.DE vs. APXJ.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Pacific ex Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF (PAC.DE) is 4.70%, while Amundi Index MSCI Pacific ex Japan SRI PAB UCITS ETF EUR Dist (APXJ.DE) has a volatility of 5.10%. This indicates that PAC.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than APXJ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PAC.DEAPXJ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.70%

5.10%

-0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.87%

8.83%

+0.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.03%

14.86%

+1.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.53%

14.33%

+0.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.56%

14.33%

+2.23%