PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAAS vs. MNSO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PAAS vs. MNSO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pan American Silver Corp. (PAAS) and MINISO Group Holding Limited (MNSO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAAS achieves a -6.53% return, which is significantly higher than MNSO's -28.13% return.


PAAS

1D
3.46%
1M
-24.13%
YTD
-6.53%
6M
-2.63%
1Y
68.49%
3Y*
50.01%
5Y*
11.06%
10Y*
14.08%

MNSO

1D
-0.38%
1M
-11.56%
YTD
-28.13%
6M
-31.03%
1Y
-25.72%
3Y*
-5.77%
5Y*
-8.42%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAAS vs. MNSO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
PAAS
Pan American Silver Corp.
-6.53%160.40%26.61%2.50%-33.00%-26.78%0.59%
MNSO
MINISO Group Holding Limited
-28.13%-18.93%20.92%93.11%6.38%-60.35%8.16%

Correlation

The correlation between PAAS and MNSO is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2020

0.23

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PAAS:

$20.31B

MNSO:

$4.03B

EPS

PAAS:

$3.21

MNSO:

CN¥6.65

PE Ratio

PAAS:

14.98

MNSO:

13.40

PEG Ratio

PAAS:

0.08

MNSO:

0.08

PS Ratio

PAAS:

4.75

MNSO:

1.21

PB Ratio

PAAS:

2.76

MNSO:

2.50

Total Revenue (TTM)

PAAS:

$4.02B

MNSO:

CN¥22.58B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PAAS:

$1.76B

MNSO:

CN¥10.10B

EBITDA (TTM)

PAAS:

$2.14B

MNSO:

CN¥3.73B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PAAS vs. MNSO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAAS
PAAS Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
PAAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAAS Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
PAAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAAS Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

MNSO
MNSO Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
MNSO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MNSO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
MNSO Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
MNSO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
MNSO Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAAS vs. MNSO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pan American Silver Corp. (PAAS) and MINISO Group Holding Limited (MNSO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PAASMNSODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

0.90

+0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.95

-0.50

+2.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.44

-0.94

+6.38

PAAS vs. MNSO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAAS Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is higher than the MNSO Sharpe Ratio of -0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAAS and MNSO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PAAS vs. MNSO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAAS drawdown since its inception was -85.10%, roughly equal to the maximum MNSO drawdown of -86.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAAS and MNSO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PAASMNSODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.10%

-86.58%

+1.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.33%

-51.47%

+16.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.33%

-54.05%

+18.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-58.89%

-80.24%

+21.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.51%

-56.44%

+26.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-41.64%

-45.53%

+3.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.63%

27.33%

-14.70%

Volatility

PAAS vs. MNSO - Volatility Comparison

Pan American Silver Corp. (PAAS) has a higher volatility of 18.82% compared to MINISO Group Holding Limited (MNSO) at 9.60%. This indicates that PAAS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MNSO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PAASMNSODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.82%

9.60%

+9.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

44.62%

23.05%

+21.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

55.23%

39.85%

+15.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

47.97%

67.13%

-19.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.62%

68.59%

-18.97%

Dividends

PAAS vs. MNSO - Dividend Comparison

PAAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%, less than MNSO's 5.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MNSO
MINISO Group Holding Limited
5.06%3.29%2.36%2.02%1.60%1.51%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PAAS
Pan American Silver Corp.
1.29%0.89%1.98%2.45%2.75%1.36%0.64%0.59%0.96%0.64%0.33%4.23%

Financials

PAAS vs. MNSO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Pan American Silver Corp. and MINISO Group Holding Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20222023202420252026
1.15B
5.65B
(PAAS) Total Revenue
(MNSO) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. PAAS values in USD, MNSO values in CNY

PAAS vs. MNSO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Pan American Silver Corp. and MINISO Group Holding Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-10.0%0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
52.7%
43.3%
Portfolio components
PAAS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Pan American Silver Corp. reported a gross profit of 608.00M and revenue of 1.15B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.7%.

MNSO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MINISO Group Holding Limited reported a gross profit of 2.45B and revenue of 5.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 43.3%.

PAAS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Pan American Silver Corp. reported an operating income of 560.00M and revenue of 1.15B, resulting in an operating margin of 48.5%.

MNSO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MINISO Group Holding Limited reported an operating income of 689.46M and revenue of 5.65B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.2%.

PAAS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Pan American Silver Corp. reported a net income of 457.00M and revenue of 1.15B, resulting in a net margin of 39.6%.

MNSO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MINISO Group Holding Limited reported a net income of 1.24B and revenue of 5.65B, resulting in a net margin of 22.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PAAS and MNSO have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PAAS has higher volatility (18.82%) compared to MNSO (9.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAAS dropped -85.10% vs MNSO's -86.58%.

PAAS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs -0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PAAS and MNSO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer