PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAAS vs. AG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PAAS vs. AG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pan American Silver Corp. (PAAS) and First Majestic Silver Corp. (AG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAAS achieves a -16.30% return, which is significantly lower than AG's -9.68% return. Over the past 10 years, PAAS has outperformed AG with an annualized return of 9.52%, while AG has yielded a comparatively lower -1.67% annualized return.


PAAS

1D
-2.09%
1M
-6.87%
6M
-20.58%
YTD
-16.30%
1Y
61.72%
3Y*
40.98%
5Y*
11.18%
10Y*
9.52%
ALL TIME*
8.09%

AG

1D
-4.21%
1M
-15.66%
6M
-27.79%
YTD
-9.68%
1Y
92.36%
3Y*
33.31%
5Y*
2.14%
10Y*
-1.67%
ALL TIME*
0.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$178.27M$175.82M$226.19M
$152.76M$168.96M$235.64M

PAAS vs. AG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PAAS
Pan American Silver Corp.
-16.30%160.40%26.61%2.50%-33.00%-26.78%46.88%63.86%-5.30%3.86%
AG
First Majestic Silver Corp.
-9.68%204.32%-10.47%-25.99%-24.73%-17.24%9.62%108.15%-12.61%-11.66%

Correlation

The correlation between PAAS and AG is 0.88, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2010

0.83

The correlation between PAAS and AG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PAAS:

$18.16B

AG:

$7.41B

EPS

PAAS:

$3.12

AG:

$0.70

PE Ratio

PAAS:

13.80

AG:

21.51

PEG Ratio

PAAS:

0.08

AG:

0.38

PS Ratio

PAAS:

4.37

AG:

4.54

PB Ratio

PAAS:

2.47

AG:

2.54

Total Revenue (TTM)

PAAS:

$4.02B

AG:

$1.64B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PAAS:

$1.76B

AG:

$863.95M

EBITDA (TTM)

PAAS:

$2.14B

AG:

$1.02B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PAAS vs. AG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PAAS
PAAS Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
PAAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAAS Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
PAAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAAS Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

AG
AG Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
AG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
AG Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
AG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
AG Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PAAS vs. AG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pan American Silver Corp. (PAAS) and First Majestic Silver Corp. (AG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PAASAGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.22

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.60

1.70

-0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.51

3.35

+0.16

PAAS vs. AG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAAS Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is comparable to the AG Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAAS and AG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PAAS vs. AG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAAS drawdown since its inception was -85.10%, smaller than the maximum AG drawdown of -90.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAAS and AG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PAASAGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.10%

-90.20%

+5.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.84%

-53.00%

+14.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.84%

-53.00%

+14.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.39%

-70.28%

+12.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.74%

-80.82%

+14.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-36.88%

-53.00%

+16.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-41.61%

-59.08%

+17.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.65%

26.79%

-9.14%

Volatility

PAAS vs. AG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pan American Silver Corp. (PAAS) is 12.10%, while First Majestic Silver Corp. (AG) has a volatility of 18.02%. This indicates that PAAS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PAASAGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.10%

18.02%

-5.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

43.93%

57.35%

-13.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

56.24%

74.97%

-18.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

48.23%

62.17%

-13.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.55%

61.87%

-12.32%

Dividends

PAAS vs. AG - Dividend Comparison

PAAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, more than AG's 0.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AG
First Majestic Silver Corp.
0.24%0.12%0.33%0.34%0.31%0.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PAAS
Pan American Silver Corp.
1.44%0.89%1.98%2.45%2.75%1.36%0.64%0.59%0.96%0.64%0.33%4.23%

Financials

PAAS vs. AG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Pan American Silver Corp. and First Majestic Silver Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

PAAS vs. AG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Pan American Silver Corp. and First Majestic Silver Corp. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

PAAS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Pan American Silver Corp. reported a gross profit of 608.00M and revenue of 1.15B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.7%.

AG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, First Majestic Silver Corp. reported a gross profit of 266.81M and revenue of 415.50M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 64.2%.

PAAS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Pan American Silver Corp. reported an operating income of 560.00M and revenue of 1.15B, resulting in an operating margin of 48.5%.

AG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, First Majestic Silver Corp. reported an operating income of 197.54M and revenue of 415.50M, resulting in an operating margin of 47.5%.

PAAS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Pan American Silver Corp. reported a net income of 457.00M and revenue of 1.15B, resulting in a net margin of 39.6%.

AG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, First Majestic Silver Corp. reported a net income of 109.43M and revenue of 415.50M, resulting in a net margin of 26.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PAAS and AG have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AG has higher volatility (18.02%) compared to PAAS (12.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAAS dropped -85.10% vs AG's -90.20%.

AG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PAAS and AG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer