PAAS vs. GFI
PAAS (Pan American Silver Corp.) and GFI (Gold Fields Limited) are both stocks. Both are in the Basic Materials sector — PAAS in Silver, GFI in Gold. Over the past 10 years, PAAS returned 14.08%/yr vs 27.45%/yr for GFI. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
PAAS vs. GFI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PAAS achieves a -6.53% return, which is significantly higher than GFI's -13.96% return. Over the past 10 years, PAAS has underperformed GFI with an annualized return of 14.08%, while GFI has yielded a comparatively higher 27.45% annualized return.
PAAS
- 1D
- 3.46%
- 1M
- -24.13%
- YTD
- -6.53%
- 6M
- -2.63%
- 1Y
- 68.49%
- 3Y*
- 50.01%
- 5Y*
- 11.06%
- 10Y*
- 14.08%
GFI
- 1D
- 1.67%
- 1M
- -18.49%
- YTD
- -13.96%
- 6M
- -13.63%
- 1Y
- 50.40%
- 3Y*
- 39.19%
- 5Y*
- 32.03%
- 10Y*
- 27.45%
PAAS vs. GFI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAAS Pan American Silver Corp. | -6.53% | 160.40% | 26.61% | 2.50% | -33.00% | -26.78% | 46.88% | 63.86% | -5.30% | 3.86% |
GFI Gold Fields Limited | -13.96% | 240.42% | -6.27% | 44.90% | -2.61% | 23.33% | 43.02% | 89.47% | -16.75% | 45.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between PAAS and GFI is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 24, 2007 | 0.69 |
The correlation between PAAS and GFI shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (10 years) to 0.80 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
PAAS:
$20.31B
GFI:
$32.65B
PAAS:
$3.21
GFI:
$5.39
PAAS:
14.98
GFI:
6.78
PAAS:
0.08
GFI:
0.11
PAAS:
4.75
GFI:
2.34
PAAS:
2.76
GFI:
3.87
PAAS:
$4.02B
GFI:
$13.98B
PAAS:
$1.76B
GFI:
$7.34B
PAAS:
$2.14B
GFI:
$8.04B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PAAS vs. GFI — Risk / Return Rank
PAAS
GFI
PAAS vs. GFI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pan American Silver Corp. (PAAS) and Gold Fields Limited (GFI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PAAS | GFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.18 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.95 | 1.15 | +0.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.44 | 3.06 | +2.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PAAS vs. GFI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PAAS drawdown since its inception was -85.10%, roughly equal to the maximum GFI drawdown of -88.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAAS and GFI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PAAS | GFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.10% | -88.05% | +2.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.33% | -43.90% | +8.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.33% | -43.90% | +8.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -58.89% | -56.22% | -2.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.74% | -63.09% | -3.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.51% | -38.93% | +9.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.64% | -44.25% | +2.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.63% | 16.51% | -3.88% |
Volatility
PAAS vs. GFI - Volatility Comparison
Pan American Silver Corp. (PAAS) has a higher volatility of 18.82% compared to Gold Fields Limited (GFI) at 17.70%. This indicates that PAAS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GFI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PAAS | GFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.82% | 17.70% | +1.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.62% | 46.40% | -1.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.23% | 59.94% | -4.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.97% | 52.37% | -4.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.62% | 54.90% | -5.28% |
Dividends
PAAS vs. GFI - Dividend Comparison
PAAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%, less than GFI's 5.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GFI Gold Fields Limited | 5.04% | 1.77% | 2.94% | 2.87% | 3.40% | 3.24% | 1.72% | 0.81% | 1.61% | 1.41% | 1.35% | 0.60% |
PAAS Pan American Silver Corp. | 1.29% | 0.89% | 1.98% | 2.45% | 2.75% | 1.36% | 0.64% | 0.59% | 0.96% | 0.64% | 0.33% | 4.23% |
Financials
PAAS vs. GFI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Pan American Silver Corp. and Gold Fields Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PAAS vs. GFI - Profitability Comparison
PAAS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Pan American Silver Corp. reported a gross profit of 608.00M and revenue of 1.15B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.7%.
GFI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported a gross profit of 3.00B and revenue of 5.29B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.7%.
PAAS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Pan American Silver Corp. reported an operating income of 560.00M and revenue of 1.15B, resulting in an operating margin of 48.5%.
GFI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported an operating income of 2.71B and revenue of 5.29B, resulting in an operating margin of 51.3%.
PAAS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Pan American Silver Corp. reported a net income of 457.00M and revenue of 1.15B, resulting in a net margin of 39.6%.
GFI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported a net income of 2.55B and revenue of 5.29B, resulting in a net margin of 48.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PAAS and GFI have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PAAS has higher volatility (18.82%) compared to GFI (17.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAAS dropped -85.10% vs GFI's -88.05%.
PAAS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PAAS and GFI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer