PAAOX vs. FERCX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

PAAOX (T. Rowe Price Asia Opportunities Fund) and FERCX (Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class C) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, PAAOX returned 8.35%/yr vs 12.94%/yr for FERCX. Their correlation of 0.88 means they have usually moved in the same direction. PAAOX charges 1.25%/yr vs 1.96%/yr for FERCX.

Performance

PAAOX vs. FERCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Asia Opportunities Fund (PAAOX) and Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class C (FERCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAAOX achieves a 7.13% return, which is significantly lower than FERCX's 22.95% return. Over the past 10 years, PAAOX has underperformed FERCX with an annualized return of 8.35%, while FERCX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.94% annualized return.

PAAOX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• 6M: 1.02%
• YTD: 7.13%
• 1Y: 23.47%
• 3Y*: 12.45%
• 5Y*: 3.05%
• 10Y*: 8.35%
• ALL TIME*: 7.64%

FERCX

• 1D: 3.45%
• 1M: -6.74%
• 6M: 12.80%
• YTD: 22.95%
• 1Y: 41.29%
• 3Y*: 26.04%
• 5Y*: 6.76%
• 10Y*: 12.94%
• ALL TIME*: 9.03%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FERCX Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class C	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
PAAOX T. Rowe Price Asia Opportunities Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

PAAOX vs. FERCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PAAOX T. Rowe Price Asia Opportunities Fund	7.13%	27.78%	11.30%	-1.00%	-19.33%	-5.50%	26.57%	24.86%	-11.26%	43.07%
FERCX Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class C	22.95%	35.65%	19.76%	12.64%	-31.29%	-15.75%	71.24%	29.64%	-15.72%	45.46%

Correlation

The correlation between PAAOX and FERCX is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.66
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.79
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.85
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2014	0.88

Over the past year, the correlation between PAAOX and FERCX has dropped to 0.66 - well below their long-term average of 0.88, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

PAAOX vs. FERCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PAAOX

PAAOX Risk / Return Rank: 42
PAAOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
PAAOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
PAAOX Omega Ratio Rank: 65
PAAOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
PAAOX Martin Ratio Rank: 30

FERCX

FERCX Risk / Return Rank: 60
FERCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
FERCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
FERCX Omega Ratio Rank: 59
FERCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
FERCX Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PAAOX vs. FERCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Asia Opportunities Fund (PAAOX) and Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class C (FERCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PAAOX	FERCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.27	1.51	-0.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.82	1.98	-0.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.28	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.53	2.45	-0.92
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.58	7.95	-3.37

PAAOX vs. FERCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAAOX Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is comparable to the FERCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAAOX and FERCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PAAOX vs. FERCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAAOX drawdown since its inception was -43.02%, smaller than the maximum FERCX drawdown of -61.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAAOX and FERCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PAAOX	FERCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.02%	-61.15%	+18.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.70%	-15.66%	+1.96%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.78%	-17.64%	-1.14%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.08%	-51.15%	+13.07%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.02%	-58.44%	+15.42%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.51%	-12.75%	+7.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.03%	-21.12%	+8.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.57%	4.82%	-0.25%

Volatility

PAAOX vs. FERCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Asia Opportunities Fund (PAAOX) is 0.00%, while Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class C (FERCX) has a volatility of 9.96%. This indicates that PAAOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FERCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PAAOX	FERCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.00%	9.96%	-9.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.66%	23.06%	-10.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.49%	25.39%	-8.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.93%	23.76%	-5.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.56%	21.51%	-3.95%

PAAOX vs. FERCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAAOX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is lower than FERCX's 1.96% expense ratio.

Dividends

PAAOX vs. FERCX - Dividend Comparison

PAAOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.21%, while FERCX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FERCX Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class C	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	14.89%	7.03%	5.13%	6.53%	0.03%	0.56%	0.92%
PAAOX T. Rowe Price Asia Opportunities Fund	3.21%	0.64%	0.00%	1.55%	1.51%	7.43%	1.33%	0.62%	0.61%	0.13%	2.12%	0.89%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PAAOX and FERCX in my portfolio?

PAAOX and FERCX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PAAOX or FERCX?

FERCX has higher volatility (9.96%) compared to PAAOX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAAOX dropped -43.02% vs FERCX's -61.15%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FERCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.