PAAA vs. FNDF

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

PAAA (PGIM AAA CLO ETF) and FNDF (Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PAAA is a CLO fund actively managed by PGIM, while FNDF is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Developed ex US Large Index (Net). PAAA is actively managed, while FNDF is passively managed. Over the past year, PAAA returned 5.10% vs 41.60% for FNDF. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PAAA charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FNDF.

Performance

PAAA vs. FNDF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM AAA CLO ETF (PAAA) and Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAAA achieves a 2.14% return, which is significantly lower than FNDF's 19.66% return.

PAAA

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.32%
• YTD: 2.14%
• 6M: 2.42%
• 1Y: 5.10%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FNDF

• 1D: 0.39%
• 1M: 0.88%
• YTD: 19.66%
• 6M: 21.60%
• 1Y: 41.60%
• 3Y*: 22.69%
• 5Y*: 13.11%
• 10Y*: 12.34%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAAA vs. FNDF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
PAAA PGIM AAA CLO ETF	2.14%	5.37%	7.47%	3.83%
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF	19.66%	40.99%	2.29%	3.56%

Correlation

The correlation between PAAA and FNDF is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.22
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2023	0.11

The correlation between PAAA and FNDF shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (all time) to 0.22 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PAAA vs. FNDF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAAA

PAAA Risk / Return Rank: 99
PAAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
PAAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
PAAA Omega Ratio Rank: 99
PAAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
PAAA Martin Ratio Rank: 99

FNDF

FNDF Risk / Return Rank: 85
FNDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
FNDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
FNDF Omega Ratio Rank: 86
FNDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
FNDF Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAAA vs. FNDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM AAA CLO ETF (PAAA) and Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PAAA	FNDF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	10.94	2.53	+8.41
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	21.40	3.30	+18.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	6.66	1.45	+5.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	29.67	3.82	+25.85
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	183.78	14.27	+169.52

PAAA vs. FNDF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAAA Sharpe Ratio is 10.94, which is higher than the FNDF Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAAA and FNDF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PAAA vs. FNDF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAAA drawdown since its inception was -1.04%, smaller than the maximum FNDF drawdown of -40.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAAA and FNDF.

Drawdown Indicators

	PAAA	FNDF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.04%	-40.14%	+39.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.17%	-10.60%	+10.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-13.89%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-25.56%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-40.14%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.94%	+1.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.02%	-7.63%	+7.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.03%	2.84%	-2.81%

Volatility

PAAA vs. FNDF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM AAA CLO ETF (PAAA) is 0.11%, while Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF) has a volatility of 6.65%. This indicates that PAAA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNDF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PAAA	FNDF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.11%	6.65%	-6.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.35%	13.64%	-13.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.47%	16.00%	-15.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.97%	16.35%	-15.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.97%	17.71%	-16.74%

PAAA vs. FNDF - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAAA has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than FNDF's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

PAAA vs. FNDF - Dividend Comparison

PAAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.88%, more than FNDF's 2.87% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF	2.87%	3.44%	4.01%	3.41%	3.10%	3.54%	2.17%	3.20%	3.47%	2.32%	2.42%	2.08%
PAAA PGIM AAA CLO ETF	4.88%	5.12%	5.88%	2.76%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PAAA and FNDF in my portfolio?

PAAA and FNDF have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PAAA or FNDF?

FNDF has higher volatility (6.65%) compared to PAAA (0.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAAA dropped -1.04% vs FNDF's -40.14%.

Which ETF is better, PAAA or FNDF?

On 1-year performance, FNDF leads with 41.60% vs 5.10% for PAAA. On fees, PAAA is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, PAAA has been the lower-risk option at 0.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PAAA or FNDF?

Over the 1-year period, FNDF has performed better with a 41.60% return vs 5.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PAAA or FNDF?

PAAA is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FNDF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PAAA or FNDF?

PAAA has the higher dividend yield at 4.88%, compared with 2.87% for FNDF.

What is the main difference between PAAA and FNDF?

PAAA is categorized as CLO, while FNDF is Foreign Large Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: PGIM and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for PAAA and 0.25% for FNDF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PAAA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (10.94 vs 2.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.