P vs. SSRM
P (Everpure, Inc.) and SSRM (SSR Mining Inc.) are both stocks. P operates in Computer Hardware (Technology), while SSRM operates in Gold (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, P returned 21.03%/yr vs 9.58%/yr for SSRM. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
P vs. SSRM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, P achieves a 7.91% return, which is significantly lower than SSRM's 24.22% return. Over the past 10 years, P has outperformed SSRM with an annualized return of 21.03%, while SSRM has yielded a comparatively lower 9.58% annualized return.
P
- 1D
- 4.28%
- 1M
- -14.36%
- YTD
- 7.91%
- 6M
- 1.39%
- 1Y
- 32.70%
- 3Y*
- 25.48%
- 5Y*
- 30.55%
- 10Y*
- 21.03%
SSRM
- 1D
- 3.46%
- 1M
- -21.64%
- YTD
- 24.22%
- 6M
- 22.60%
- 1Y
- 119.07%
- 3Y*
- 25.15%
- 5Y*
- 9.84%
- 10Y*
- 9.58%
P vs. SSRM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
P Everpure, Inc. | 7.91% | 9.08% | 72.27% | 33.26% | -17.79% | 43.96% | 32.14% | 6.41% | 1.39% | 40.23% |
SSRM SSR Mining Inc. | 24.22% | 214.94% | -35.32% | -29.94% | -10.02% | -10.90% | 4.41% | 59.31% | 37.54% | -1.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between P and SSRM is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2015 | 0.10 |
The correlation between P and SSRM shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (all time) to 0.22 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
P:
$23.61B
SSRM:
$5.93B
P:
$0.56
SSRM:
$3.27
P:
129.77
SSRM:
8.34
P:
4.02
SSRM:
0.13
P:
6.67
SSRM:
3.11
P:
$3.66B
SSRM:
$1.90B
P:
$2.58B
SSRM:
$643.76M
P:
$306.67M
SSRM:
$835.27M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
P vs. SSRM — Risk / Return Rank
P
SSRM
P vs. SSRM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Everpure, Inc. (P) and SSR Mining Inc. (SSRM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| P | SSRM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.30 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.78 | 3.83 | -3.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.50 | 9.89 | -8.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
P vs. SSRM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum P drawdown since its inception was -69.43%, smaller than the maximum SSRM drawdown of -91.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for P and SSRM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| P | SSRM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.43% | -91.68% | +22.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.26% | -31.28% | -10.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.63% | -73.41% | +24.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.63% | -83.16% | +34.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.43% | -83.16% | +13.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.74% | -37.45% | +10.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.44% | -57.15% | +32.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.89% | 12.09% | +9.80% |
Volatility
P vs. SSRM - Volatility Comparison
Everpure, Inc. (P) has a higher volatility of 26.95% compared to SSR Mining Inc. (SSRM) at 19.31%. This indicates that P's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SSRM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| P | SSRM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 26.95% | 19.31% | +7.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.02% | 54.27% | -9.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 68.32% | 66.63% | +1.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.74% | 55.93% | -3.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.15% | 52.96% | -1.81% |
Dividends
P vs. SSRM - Dividend Comparison
Neither P nor SSRM has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
P Everpure, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SSRM SSR Mining Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.60% | 1.79% | 1.13% |
Financials
P vs. SSRM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Everpure, Inc. and SSR Mining Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
P vs. SSRM - Profitability Comparison
P - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Everpure, Inc. reported a gross profit of 536.15M and revenue of 778.49M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.9%.
SSRM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SSR Mining Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 581.78M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
P - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Everpure, Inc. reported an operating income of -31.17M and revenue of 778.49M, resulting in an operating margin of -4.0%.
SSRM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SSR Mining Inc. reported an operating income of 300.38M and revenue of 581.78M, resulting in an operating margin of 51.6%.
P - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Everpure, Inc. reported a net income of -14.00M and revenue of 778.49M, resulting in a net margin of -1.8%.
SSRM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SSR Mining Inc. reported a net income of 369.74M and revenue of 581.78M, resulting in a net margin of 63.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
P and SSRM have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
P has higher volatility (26.95%) compared to SSRM (19.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, P dropped -69.43% vs SSRM's -91.68%.
SSRM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for P and SSRM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer