P vs. RMBS
P (Everpure, Inc.) and RMBS (Rambus Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — P in Computer Hardware, RMBS in Semiconductors. Over the past 10 years, P returned 21.70%/yr vs 26.97%/yr for RMBS. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
P vs. RMBS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, P achieves a 7.98% return, which is significantly lower than RMBS's 39.53% return. Over the past 10 years, P has underperformed RMBS with an annualized return of 21.70%, while RMBS has yielded a comparatively higher 26.97% annualized return.
P
- 1D
- -6.07%
- 1M
- -17.02%
- YTD
- 7.98%
- 6M
- 7.57%
- 1Y
- 35.89%
- 3Y*
- 26.38%
- 5Y*
- 29.83%
- 10Y*
- 21.70%
RMBS
- 1D
- -8.65%
- 1M
- -10.33%
- YTD
- 39.53%
- 6M
- 36.12%
- 1Y
- 113.68%
- 3Y*
- 29.33%
- 5Y*
- 40.20%
- 10Y*
- 26.97%
P vs. RMBS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
P Everpure, Inc. | 7.98% | 9.08% | 72.27% | 33.26% | -17.79% | 43.96% | 32.14% | 6.41% | 1.39% | 40.23% |
RMBS Rambus Inc. | 39.53% | 73.84% | -22.55% | 90.54% | 21.88% | 68.33% | 26.75% | 79.60% | -46.06% | 3.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between P and RMBS is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2015 | 0.49 |
The correlation between P and RMBS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
P:
$23.63B
RMBS:
$14.07B
P:
$0.56
RMBS:
$2.11
P:
129.86
RMBS:
60.90
P:
4.02
RMBS:
0.13
P:
6.67
RMBS:
19.42
P:
$3.66B
RMBS:
$721.16M
P:
$2.58B
RMBS:
$555.52M
P:
$306.67M
RMBS:
$298.07M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
P vs. RMBS — Risk / Return Rank
P
RMBS
P vs. RMBS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Everpure, Inc. (P) and Rambus Inc. (RMBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| P | RMBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.28 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.85 | 3.12 | -2.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.62 | 7.63 | -6.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
P vs. RMBS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum P drawdown since its inception was -69.43%, smaller than the maximum RMBS drawdown of -97.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for P and RMBS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| P | RMBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.43% | -97.16% | +27.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.26% | -36.69% | -5.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.63% | -48.83% | +0.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.63% | -48.83% | +0.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.43% | -52.95% | -16.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.69% | -24.87% | -1.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.44% | -74.84% | +50.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.22% | 14.96% | +7.26% |
Volatility
P vs. RMBS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Everpure, Inc. (P) is 27.57%, while Rambus Inc. (RMBS) has a volatility of 29.44%. This indicates that P experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RMBS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| P | RMBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 27.57% | 29.44% | -1.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.93% | 62.64% | -17.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 68.55% | 77.19% | -8.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.87% | 55.71% | -2.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.10% | 46.52% | +4.58% |
Dividends
P vs. RMBS - Dividend Comparison
Neither P nor RMBS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
P vs. RMBS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Everpure, Inc. and Rambus Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
P vs. RMBS - Profitability Comparison
P - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Everpure, Inc. reported a gross profit of 536.15M and revenue of 778.49M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.9%.
RMBS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rambus Inc. reported a gross profit of 143.66M and revenue of 180.19M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.7%.
P - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Everpure, Inc. reported an operating income of -31.17M and revenue of 778.49M, resulting in an operating margin of -4.0%.
RMBS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rambus Inc. reported an operating income of 61.76M and revenue of 180.19M, resulting in an operating margin of 34.3%.
P - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Everpure, Inc. reported a net income of -14.00M and revenue of 778.49M, resulting in a net margin of -1.8%.
RMBS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rambus Inc. reported a net income of 59.86M and revenue of 180.19M, resulting in a net margin of 33.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
P and RMBS have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RMBS has higher volatility (29.44%) compared to P (27.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, P dropped -69.43% vs RMBS's -97.16%.
RMBS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for P and RMBS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer