P vs. MRVL
P (Everpure, Inc.) and MRVL (Marvell Technology, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — P in Computer Hardware, MRVL in Semiconductors. Over the past 10 years, P returned 19.89%/yr vs 33.72%/yr for MRVL. Their 0.52 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
P vs. MRVL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, P achieves a 19.59% return, which is significantly lower than MRVL's 128.36% return. Over the past 10 years, P has underperformed MRVL with an annualized return of 19.89%, while MRVL has yielded a comparatively higher 33.72% annualized return.
P
- 1D
- 3.85%
- 1M
- 10.22%
- 6M
- 13.93%
- YTD
- 19.59%
- 1Y
- 47.02%
- 3Y*
- 28.75%
- 5Y*
- 31.60%
- 10Y*
- 19.89%
- ALL TIME*
- 15.57%
MRVL
- 1D
- 3.31%
- 1M
- -20.98%
- 6M
- 146.53%
- YTD
- 128.36%
- 1Y
- 160.83%
- 3Y*
- 46.12%
- 5Y*
- 26.11%
- 10Y*
- 33.72%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.34%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $4.33B | $5.02B | $10.54B | |
| $157.03M | $171.75M | $259.17M |
P vs. MRVL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
P Everpure, Inc. | 19.59% | 9.08% | 72.27% | 33.26% | -17.79% | 43.96% | 32.14% | 6.41% | 1.39% | 40.23% |
MRVL Marvell Technology, Inc. | 128.36% | -22.82% | 83.79% | 63.68% | -57.48% | 84.62% | 80.25% | 65.74% | -23.62% | 56.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between P and MRVL is 0.51, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.61 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2015 | 0.52 |
The correlation between P and MRVL shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (1 year) to 0.61 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
P:
$26.64B
MRVL:
$169.70B
P:
$0.56
MRVL:
$2.89
P:
143.83
MRVL:
66.96
P:
4.46
MRVL:
0.12
P:
7.39
MRVL:
19.41
P:
$3.66B
MRVL:
$8.72B
P:
$2.58B
MRVL:
$4.41B
P:
$306.67M
MRVL:
$4.27B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
P vs. MRVL — Risk / Return Rank
P
MRVL
P vs. MRVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Everpure, Inc. (P) and Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| P | MRVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.35 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.12 | 3.35 | -2.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.99 | 10.61 | -8.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
P vs. MRVL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum P drawdown since its inception was -69.43%, smaller than the maximum MRVL drawdown of -91.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for P and MRVL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| P | MRVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.43% | -91.60% | +22.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.26% | -48.35% | +6.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.63% | -60.79% | +12.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.63% | -61.88% | +13.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.43% | -61.88% | -7.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.80% | -38.75% | +19.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.44% | -46.63% | +22.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 23.67% | 15.22% | +8.45% |
Volatility
P vs. MRVL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Everpure, Inc. (P) is 18.77%, while Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL) has a volatility of 26.21%. This indicates that P experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MRVL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| P | MRVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.77% | 26.21% | -7.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 47.35% | 65.25% | -17.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 70.79% | 77.70% | -6.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 53.54% | 63.82% | -10.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.50% | 52.86% | -1.36% |
Dividends
P vs. MRVL - Dividend Comparison
P has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MRVL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MRVL Marvell Technology, Inc. | 0.12% | 0.28% | 0.22% | 0.40% | 0.65% | 0.21% | 0.50% | 0.90% | 1.48% | 1.12% | 1.73% | 2.72% |
P Everpure, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
P vs. MRVL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Everpure, Inc. and Marvell Technology, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
P vs. MRVL - Profitability Comparison
P - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Everpure, Inc. reported a gross profit of 536.15M and revenue of 778.49M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.9%.
MRVL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Marvell Technology, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.26B and revenue of 2.42B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.2%.
P - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Everpure, Inc. reported an operating income of -31.17M and revenue of 778.49M, resulting in an operating margin of -4.0%.
MRVL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Marvell Technology, Inc. reported an operating income of 339.40M and revenue of 2.42B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.0%.
P - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Everpure, Inc. reported a net income of -14.00M and revenue of 778.49M, resulting in a net margin of -1.8%.
MRVL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Marvell Technology, Inc. reported a net income of 34.50M and revenue of 2.42B, resulting in a net margin of 1.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
P and MRVL have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MRVL has higher volatility (26.21%) compared to P (18.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, P dropped -69.43% vs MRVL's -91.60%.
MRVL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for P and MRVL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer