OZEM vs. CNCR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

OZEM (Roundhill Glp-1 & Weight Loss ETF) and CNCR (Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds. OZEM is actively managed, while CNCR is passively managed. OZEM charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for CNCR.

Performance

OZEM vs. CNCR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Glp-1 & Weight Loss ETF (OZEM) and Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF (CNCR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

OZEM

• 1D: -0.73%
• 1M: -4.02%
• YTD: -11.95%
• 6M: -5.58%
• 1Y: 21.16%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CNCR

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OZEM vs. CNCR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
OZEM Roundhill Glp-1 & Weight Loss ETF	-14.07%
CNCR Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF	0.00%

OZEM vs. CNCR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	OZEM	CNCR
Healthcare	100.0%	96.6%
Financial Services	0.1%	3.3%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

OZEM vs. CNCR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OZEM

OZEM Risk / Return Rank: 23
OZEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
OZEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
OZEM Omega Ratio Rank: 24
OZEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
OZEM Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OZEM vs. CNCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Glp-1 & Weight Loss ETF (OZEM) and Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF (CNCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	OZEM	CNCR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.87	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.34	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.11	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.30	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	OZEM	CNCR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.38	—	—

Drawdowns

OZEM vs. CNCR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OZEM drawdown since its inception was -28.65%, which is greater than CNCR's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OZEM and CNCR.

Drawdown Indicators

	OZEM	CNCR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.65%	0.00%	-28.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.16%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.74%	0.00%	-18.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.90%	0.00%	-8.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.22%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	OZEM	CNCR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.67%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.15%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.46%	0.00%	+24.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.04%	0.00%	+25.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.04%	0.00%	+25.04%

OZEM vs. CNCR - Expense Ratio Comparison

OZEM has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than CNCR's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

OZEM vs. CNCR - Dividend Comparison

OZEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, while CNCR has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
CNCR Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
OZEM Roundhill Glp-1 & Weight Loss ETF	1.36%	1.20%	0.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, OZEM or CNCR?

On fees, OZEM is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, OZEM or CNCR?

OZEM is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for CNCR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, OZEM or CNCR?

OZEM has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 0.00% for CNCR.

What is the main difference between OZEM and CNCR?

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for OZEM and 0.79% for CNCR.