PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OWSMX vs. MBXIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OWSMX vs. MBXIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Old Westbury Small & Mid Cap Strategies Fund (OWSMX) and Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I (MBXIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OWSMX achieves a 9.99% return, which is significantly lower than MBXIX's 12.91% return. Over the past 10 years, OWSMX has underperformed MBXIX with an annualized return of 7.27%, while MBXIX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.68% annualized return.


OWSMX

1D
2.02%
1M
-1.14%
6M
3.79%
YTD
9.99%
1Y
18.59%
3Y*
12.20%
5Y*
3.30%
10Y*
7.27%
ALL TIME*
8.34%

MBXIX

1D
-0.28%
1M
-2.01%
6M
8.54%
YTD
12.91%
1Y
17.43%
3Y*
10.12%
5Y*
7.38%
10Y*
7.68%
ALL TIME*
8.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

OWSMX vs. MBXIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
OWSMX
Old Westbury Small & Mid Cap Strategies Fund
9.99%18.06%7.76%11.67%-22.54%4.10%22.11%24.52%-12.04%18.20%
MBXIX
Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I
12.91%4.35%13.49%-0.67%7.72%16.89%-0.45%13.83%-2.16%13.99%

Correlation

The correlation between OWSMX and MBXIX is 0.42, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2015

0.53

The correlation between OWSMX and MBXIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (3 years) to 0.53 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OWSMX vs. MBXIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

OWSMX
OWSMX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
OWSMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OWSMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
OWSMX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
OWSMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
OWSMX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

MBXIX
MBXIX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
MBXIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MBXIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
MBXIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
MBXIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
MBXIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

OWSMX vs. MBXIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Old Westbury Small & Mid Cap Strategies Fund (OWSMX) and Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I (MBXIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OWSMXMBXIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.40

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.44

3.88

-2.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.44

14.92

-9.48

OWSMX vs. MBXIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OWSMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is lower than the MBXIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OWSMX and MBXIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OWSMX vs. MBXIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OWSMX drawdown since its inception was -38.35%, which is greater than MBXIX's maximum drawdown of -31.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OWSMX and MBXIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OWSMXMBXIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.35%

-31.73%

-6.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.67%

-3.85%

-7.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.97%

-15.59%

-0.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.57%

-15.59%

-18.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.96%

-31.73%

-4.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.25%

-2.68%

+0.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.13%

-3.95%

-4.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.09%

1.04%

+2.05%

Volatility

OWSMX vs. MBXIX - Volatility Comparison

Old Westbury Small & Mid Cap Strategies Fund (OWSMX) has a higher volatility of 4.11% compared to Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I (MBXIX) at 1.59%. This indicates that OWSMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MBXIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OWSMXMBXIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.11%

1.59%

+2.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.03%

4.89%

+7.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.58%

6.90%

+7.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.33%

11.40%

+4.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.42%

13.36%

+3.06%

OWSMX vs. MBXIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

OWSMX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is lower than MBXIX's 2.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

OWSMX vs. MBXIX - Dividend Comparison

OWSMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.64%, while MBXIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MBXIX
Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I
0.00%0.00%2.63%2.25%7.74%0.00%4.27%5.18%3.33%3.33%1.91%0.00%
OWSMX
Old Westbury Small & Mid Cap Strategies Fund
7.64%8.41%3.92%0.65%0.52%6.04%3.23%4.65%12.54%7.43%6.32%10.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


OWSMX and MBXIX have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OWSMX has higher volatility (4.11%) compared to MBXIX (1.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OWSMX dropped -38.35% vs MBXIX's -31.73%.

MBXIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OWSMX and MBXIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer