OWNS vs. NEE
OWNS (CCM Affordable Housing MBS ETF) is Mortgage Backed Securities fund actively managed by CCM, while NEE (NextEra Energy, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past year, OWNS returned 6.10% vs 18.32% for NEE. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
OWNS vs. NEE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OWNS achieves a 0.42% return, which is significantly lower than NEE's 8.63% return.
OWNS
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 0.42%
- 6M
- 0.95%
- 1Y
- 6.10%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NEE
- 1D
- 1.36%
- 1M
- -9.47%
- YTD
- 8.63%
- 6M
- 6.81%
- 1Y
- 18.32%
- 3Y*
- 8.11%
- 5Y*
- 5.94%
- 10Y*
- 13.51%
OWNS vs. NEE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
OWNS CCM Affordable Housing MBS ETF | 0.42% | 7.75% | 3.65% |
NEE NextEra Energy, Inc. | 8.63% | 15.47% | 21.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between OWNS and NEE is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2024 | 0.19 |
The correlation between OWNS and NEE shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (1 year) to 0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OWNS vs. NEE — Risk / Return Rank
OWNS
NEE
OWNS vs. NEE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CCM Affordable Housing MBS ETF (OWNS) and NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OWNS | NEE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.17 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.88 | 1.37 | +0.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.29 | 3.78 | +1.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OWNS vs. NEE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OWNS drawdown since its inception was -5.39%, smaller than the maximum NEE drawdown of -47.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OWNS and NEE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OWNS | NEE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.39% | -47.81% | +42.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.03% | -14.53% | +11.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -34.57% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -44.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.61% | -11.50% | +9.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.55% | -8.93% | +7.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.07% | 5.25% | -4.18% |
Volatility
OWNS vs. NEE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CCM Affordable Housing MBS ETF (OWNS) is 1.47%, while NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE) has a volatility of 8.52%. This indicates that OWNS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NEE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OWNS | NEE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.47% | 8.52% | -7.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.13% | 16.75% | -13.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.45% | 23.78% | -19.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.38% | 26.91% | -21.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.38% | 25.49% | -20.11% |
Dividends
OWNS vs. NEE - Dividend Comparison
OWNS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.31%, more than NEE's 2.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NEE NextEra Energy, Inc. | 2.77% | 2.82% | 2.87% | 3.08% | 2.03% | 1.65% | 1.81% | 2.06% | 2.55% | 2.52% | 2.91% | 2.96% |
OWNS CCM Affordable Housing MBS ETF | 4.31% | 4.12% | 3.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OWNS and NEE have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NEE has higher volatility (8.52%) compared to OWNS (1.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OWNS dropped -5.39% vs NEE's -47.81%.
OWNS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.28 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OWNS and NEE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer