PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OVV vs. CL=F
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

OVV vs. CL=F - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ovintiv Inc. (OVV) and Crude Oil WTI (CL=F). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

OVV vs. CL=F - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
OVV
Ovintiv Inc.
47.32%-0.30%-5.23%-10.93%53.29%138.31%-34.91%-17.62%-56.37%14.20%
CL=F
Crude Oil WTI
72.26%-19.41%-0.82%-10.70%7.44%53.98%-19.98%32.92%-24.35%12.51%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OVV achieves a 47.32% return, which is significantly lower than CL=F's 72.26% return. Over the past 10 years, OVV has underperformed CL=F with an annualized return of 8.89%, while CL=F has yielded a comparatively higher 10.40% annualized return.


OVV

1D
-3.27%
1M
10.69%
YTD
47.32%
6M
43.52%
1Y
34.42%
3Y*
20.07%
5Y*
21.11%
10Y*
8.89%

CL=F

1D
-2.44%
1M
38.86%
YTD
72.26%
6M
60.10%
1Y
38.92%
3Y*
9.28%
5Y*
9.98%
10Y*
10.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OVV vs. CL=F — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OVV
OVV Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
OVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
OVV Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
OVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
OVV Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

CL=F
CL=F Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
CL=F Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CL=F Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
CL=F Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
CL=F Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
CL=F Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OVV vs. CL=F - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ovintiv Inc. (OVV) and Crude Oil WTI (CL=F). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OVVCL=FDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.77

0.83

-0.06

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.24

1.35

-0.11

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.18

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.29

2.08

-0.79

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.28

3.45

-0.17

OVV vs. CL=F - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OVV Sharpe Ratio is 0.77, which is comparable to the CL=F Sharpe Ratio of 0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OVV and CL=F, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OVVCL=FDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

0.83

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

0.26

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

0.20

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.07

0.07

+0.01

Correlation

The correlation between OVV and CL=F is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Drawdowns

OVV vs. CL=F - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OVV drawdown since its inception was -98.88%, which is greater than CL=F's maximum drawdown of -92.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OVV and CL=F.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


OVVCL=FDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.88%

-92.04%

-6.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.36%

-27.07%

-2.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.13%

-53.86%

+6.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-96.82%

-84.82%

-12.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-65.22%

-31.92%

-33.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-51.96%

-40.84%

-11.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.55%

16.32%

-4.77%

Volatility

OVV vs. CL=F - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ovintiv Inc. (OVV) is 8.82%, while Crude Oil WTI (CL=F) has a volatility of 27.34%. This indicates that OVV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CL=F based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


OVVCL=FDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.82%

27.34%

-18.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.69%

33.40%

-8.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.85%

41.12%

+3.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

46.33%

36.54%

+9.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

60.56%

48.71%

+11.85%